Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Advocating in closing arguments: avoiding the pitfalls of reversible error

Article Abstract:

There are a number of forms of argumentation in a trial's closing argument that can result in reversible error, and trial lawyers should stay current on their jurisdiction's interpretation of the fundamental error rule. Counsel should run their closing argument by the firm's appellate partner and should be willing to object during opposing counsel's closing argument. The lines of argument that could trigger a new trial include comparative verdict arguments, invocation of the golden rule, citing parties financial resources, personal opinions and misstatements of law.

Author: Clayton, William R., Stark, Steven E.
Publisher: Federation of Defense and Corporate Counsel
Publication Name: Federation of Insurance & Corporate Counsel Quarterly
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0887-0942
Year: 1997
Methods, Florida, Trial practice, Summation (Law), states

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The impact of FIRREA on insurer and surety defense litigation

Article Abstract:

The use of affirmative defenses by insurance industry employees being sued in the wake of insolvency by the Resolution Trust Corp or the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp may be limited by the limits on jurisdiction in the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989. Conflicting decisions on the statute's effects have been handed down by the courts, but it is probably wise for people anticipating such litigation to secure an affirmative defense as soon as possible.

Author: Morgan, Richard A., Clayton, William R., Shasha, Jennifer G.
Publisher: Federation of Defense and Corporate Counsel
Publication Name: Federation of Insurance & Corporate Counsel Quarterly
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0887-0942
Year: 1995
Cases, Insurance industry, Financial institutions, United States. Resolution Trust Corp., United States. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., Surety bonds

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Spoliation of evidence: the trend to a new tort

Article Abstract:

Evidence spoliation is being recognized in some states as an independent tort and thus parties can seek sanctions for loss of evidence. Several elements must be satisfied to recover for spoliation, including intentionality, timing, and the victim's behavior. Courts have proven willing to dismiss or enter default judgments to remedy spoliation victims. The 50 states are surveyed as to their positions on evidence spoliation.

Author: Clayton, William R., Miller, Gregory D., Levy-Sachs, Rebecca, Morin, Antonio D.
Publisher: Federation of Defense and Corporate Counsel
Publication Name: Federation of Insurance & Corporate Counsel Quarterly
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0887-0942
Year: 1999
United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Evidence (Law), Torts, Legal documents, Evidence spoliation

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Staying out of jail; keeping your license and staying out of trouble. By the letter; writing around potential malpractice hazards
  • Abstracts: Educating small firms on legal technologies. Supporting firms that strive to donate services. Addressing implications of digital signatures
  • Abstracts: With affirmative action rulings, more minorities look for PALS. It's time to relax and get a life, Chief Justice tells 1995's grads
  • Abstracts: Meetings by video now can happen on desktop: law firms that want to use video conferencing can choose either a PC-based or a group system
  • Abstracts: A case of first impression: American Indians seek cancellation of the trademarked term "Redskins." Trademark law in the computer age: applying trademark principles to the "look and feel" of software
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.