Agency authority to define the scope of private rights of action

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court should repudiate its reasoning in the Adams Fruit and Kelley cases, and instead rule agencies are authorized to accept reasonable interpretations of agency-administered laws, even if those interpretations bind courts in private rights of action. In Kelley, the Court should have focused on CERCLA's rulemaking authorization and the pragmatic reasoning employed in similar cases involving private rights of action. Federal regulatory statutes allowing courts to hear private rights of action often lead to problematic interpretations.

United States, Cases, United States. Environmental Protection Agency, Powers and duties, Right of action

---

Seven ways to deossify agency rulemaking

Article Abstract:

Administrative agency rulemaking can be liberated with seven innovations, but there are differing advantages and disadvantages of these techniques. Restricting ripeness and standing would give too much immunity from judicial review. Closer questions are the giving of binding power to rules or a reduction in decisionmaking scope. Other techniques are to remand with no vacation, interim rules on remand and judicial deference to agencies.

---

State ex rel. Celebrezze v. National Lime & Stone Co.: redefining agency deference in Ohio

Article Abstract:

The Ohio Supreme Court has given an unprecedented reversal of judicial deference for administrative agencies, holding that ambiguous air pollution regulations will now favor the regulated subjects instead of agencies. The decision of State ex rel. Celebrezze v. National Lime & Stone Co. involved the rulemaking of the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency. This decision fits the goal of helping business while not hurting the environment.

Air pollution control, Air quality management

Similar abstracts:

• Abstracts: Agency policy: to break the law? Report: feds don't guard civil rights. OTS guidelines for thrifts' D & Os raise questions
• Abstracts: Baby Bells say: wrong number; the 8th Circuit is asked to decide the future of telcom deregulation. Much feared 'Dingell-grams' to be a thing of the past
• Abstracts: New interpretation of definitely determinable standard for profit-sharing plans prohibits multiple allocation formulas
• Abstracts: "Shooting the piano player"? Justice Scalia and administrative law. Wade's seventh edition and recent English administrative law

This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.