Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Agreements to arbitrate statutory fair employment practices claims: unforeseen consequences for the at-will employer

Article Abstract:

Employers who agree to arbitrate fair employment practice claims may destroy the freedoms given them by the employment-at-will doctrine. This will happen due to the doctrine's interaction with the statute regarding substantive arbitrability in commercial cases; the routine usage in arbitration of the allocation of proof paradigm and the disparate treatment order; and the protection from discrimination given white men by Section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. At-will employers may end up having to arbitrate all discharges of both protected- and non-protected group members.

Author: Hayford, Stephen L.
Publisher: Commerce Clearing House, Inc.
Publication Name: Labor Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0023-6586
Year: 1995
Employment discrimination, Labor disputes

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Use of incognito testimony of a non-employee witness in a discharge for conduct arbitration

Article Abstract:

A labor arbitrator upheld the discharge of an employee for alleged criminal conduct even though the only witness against him testified incognito. The arbitrator permitted the witness to testify behind a screen and to limit cross-examination to questions that did not disclose his identity. This procedure was a grave violation of the defendant's due process right to confront and cross-examine his accuser and to be discharged for just cause alone.

Author: Wolff, Aaron S.
Publisher: Commerce Clearing House, Inc.
Publication Name: Labor Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0023-6586
Year: 1999
United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Witnesses, Labor arbitration, Confrontation (Criminal law), Confrontation (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The U.S. Supreme Court rules on duty to arbitrate post-contract grievances

Article Abstract:

The Supreme Court's reversal of the Ninth Circuit's decision in NLRB v. Litton Financial Printing Division clarifies the arbitration of post-contract grievances. The Court ruled that the although the Litton contract had a broad arbitration clause, the layoff dispute was not arbitrable because it did not stem from the contract. Under this ruling post-contract grievances can only be arbitrated if such arbitration is provided for in the contract.

Author: Hodapp, Paul F.
Publisher: Commerce Clearing House, Inc.
Publication Name: Labor Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0023-6586
Year: 1991
Interpretation and construction, Cases, Contracts, Grievance arbitration

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Negotiation, mediation and arbitration, Labor contracts, Employee dismissals, Employment terminations, Employment at will
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Hate crimes, harassment split ACLU; critics claim group ignoring free speech concerns in quest for social justice
  • Abstracts: Settlements in EC merger control proceedings: a summary of EC enforcement practice and a comparison with the United States
  • Abstracts: Settlements in EC merger control proceedings: a summary of EC enforcement practice and a comparison with the United States. part 2
  • Abstracts: Independent contractors or employees: the view from the National Labor Relations Board. Unit placement decisions in acute care hospitals
  • Abstracts: Insurer out to eliminate middleman; critics claim accident victims in better hands with lawyers than with Allstate
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.