Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

An examination of the champertous assignment of bare causes of action

Article Abstract:

Champerty refers to the maintenance of a cause of action, by a person not otherwise interested, in consideration of a promise to share in the proceeds or subject matter. In Australia, a related statute prohibiting the assignment of bare causes of action continues to influence the administration of civil justice. However, persuasive arguments support relaxing the limits on these assignments such as encouraging settlements and helping plaintiffs with valid claims but insufficient funds.

Author: Campbell, Colin D.
Publisher: LBC Information Services
Publication Name: Australian Business Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0310-1053
Year: 1999
Assignments, Assignments (Law), Maintenance and champerty, Maintenance (Criminal law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Freight forwarder: principal or agent? What difference does it make?

Article Abstract:

Issues involving the legal complexities of multi-modal (sea/land) freight transport with respect to lost or damaged cargo in an international context are discussed. Issues include the problem of pinpointing the contractual rights and responsibilities of transport providers, the need to establish whether a freight forwarder is a 'carrier' for the purpose of relevant international treaties, and the process for establishing the rights and defenses of forwarders and shippers.

Author: Bristow, Gillian
Publisher: LBC Information Services
Publication Name: Australian Business Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0310-1053
Year: 1999
International, International aspects, International trade, Intermodal transportation, International trade regulation, Marine cargo handling industry, Marine cargo handling

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Corporate environmental reporting

Article Abstract:

Requirements under Australia's Corporations Law enacted in 1998 requiring the directors of some companies to include details of their firm's environmental performance in the annual director's report are discussed. A court finding a director in noncompliance with the law may impose substantial penalties on the director and, in serious cases, even ban the director from managing the firm.

Author: Thompson, Lauren
Publisher: LBC Information Services
Publication Name: Australian Business Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0310-1053
Year: 1999
Interpretation and construction, Corporate directors, Corporation reports, Company reports, Environmental law

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Australia, Laws, regulations and rules
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Voluntary mediation in New York State. The pros and cons of mediation
  • Abstracts: Abolition of the presumption of 'doli incapax' and the criminalisation of children
  • Abstracts: Institutionalization of ethics: the perspective of managers. Exploitation or choice? Exploring the relative attractiveness of employment in the maquiladoras
  • Abstracts: Giving back: an examination of the philanthropic motivations, orientations and activities of large black-owned businesses
  • Abstracts: A critique of the empirical methods of integrative social contacts theory
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.