Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

An overview of the antitrust analysis of suppression of technology

Article Abstract:

Antitrust law falters in addressing issues regarding the suppression of technology. The suppression of technology is any conduct or agreement that restrains the availability or exploitation of a product or process. The suppression of technology could occur from the acquisition and suppression of new technologies, unilateral suppression by the originator or patent holder, and concerted suppression under an agreement by several individuals or organizations.

Author: Cohen, Joel M., Burke, Arthur J.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Antitrust Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0003-6056
Year: 1998

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Unilateral technology suppression: appropriate antitrust and patent law remedies

Article Abstract:

The antitrust remedies for improper unilateral suppression of technology depend on the patent holder's relation to the technology. The inventors of technologies should have nearly unlimited freedom under antitrust laws to utilize or to not utilize their patents. The remedies for the non-inventor patent holder who unilaterally suppresses technology may be found under either Section 7 of the Clayton Act or Section 2 of the Sherman Act.

Author: Chin, Yee Wah
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Antitrust Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0003-6056
Year: 1998
Remedies, Patent law

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Foreword

Article Abstract:

The suppression of beneficial technologies from the public's use is permissible under American antitrust and intellectual property laws but is not permissible under the laws of the European Union. Both bodies of law, however, are meant to promote technological innovation for the welfare of consumers. The issue for this symposium was to consider why American antitrust and intellectual property laws allow technology suppression.

Author: Crew, Eugene
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Antitrust Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0003-6056
Year: 1998
Laws, regulations and rules, Technological innovations, European Union

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Social aspects, United States, Antitrust law, Diffusion of innovations
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The role of cost-effectiveness analysis in assessing HIV-prevention interventions. Building community and culture are essential to successful HIV prevention for gay and bisexual men
  • Abstracts: The work of the Sixth Committee at the fifty-first session of the UN General Assembly. Toward world antitrust and market access
  • Abstracts: A drop in the ocean? The discharge grant and the immediate needs of prisoners on release from custody. part 2 Programmes for violent men: recent developments in the UK
  • Abstracts: Creating competition policy: Betty Bock and the development of antitrust institutions. The quality of appointments and the capability of the Federal Trade Commission
  • Abstracts: Airline predation and injury to state economies: support of 25 state attorneys general. 6 airlines but no price competition: crippled economic growth in Rochester, New York
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.