Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

An update on choice of law in franchise agreements: a trend toward unenforceability and limited application

Article Abstract:

The choice of law for franchise agreements is developing into problems of limited application and unenforceability. The issue is over which state's law applies to the franchise if businesses are in different states. The decisions of Modern Computer Systems, Inc v. Modern Banking Systems, Inc and Tele-Save Merchandising Co v. Consumers Distributing Co illustrate successful waiving of franchise laws of states in favor of the states chosen by the contracting parties. However, other cases indicate the rarity of these successes.

Author: Bauch, Reva S.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Franchise Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 8756-7962
Year: 1995

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Dependence and reliance: keys to unshackling co-branding alliances from federal franchise rule compliance

Article Abstract:

Newer and less affluent franchisors can particularly benefit from exclusions from federal pre-sale registration and disclosure laws when making co-branding alliances. Two practical methods leading to exclusion which may be of possible use are based upon the FTC's Franchise Rule's element of significant control or assistance and the Rule's exemption for fractional franchises. Nonregulation of co-branding alliances can aid in efficient and profitable business relations but is not proper for all such alliances.

Author: Cannon, Charles B.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Franchise Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 8756-7962
Year: 1997
Strategic alliances (Business)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Effect of arbitration and choice of law clauses on the application of Puerto Rico's Dealers Act

Article Abstract:

Practitioners should carefully draft and include choice of law provisions within franchise agreement arbitration clauses because doing so may preclude applicability of the Puerto Rico Dealer Act or similar laws. This type of drafting may help ensure enforceability and will authorize an arbitrator to decide on the applicable franchise law. The Federal Arbitration Act will be applicable in US-Puerto Rico franchise disputes, and may be preferable to the Puerto Rican statute.

Author: Barrios-Amy, Rossell
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Franchise Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 8756-7962
Year: 1996
Interpretation and construction, Puerto Rico, Commercial arbitration agreements

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Contracts, Franchises, Conflict of laws, Commercial law
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: An LSC dispute may take power from president; a ruling could strengthen Senate's hand during federal policy stalemate
  • Abstracts: There is a developing trend among courts of making choice of forum clauses in franchise agreements presumptively invalid
  • Abstracts: Long-term care insurance: a product for today. Genetic information and risk classification in individual life and health insurance
  • Abstracts: An economic overview of patents. An economic review and suggessted approach for licensing patent applications
  • Abstracts: When does a sovereign state control a company? Plaintiffs are asking a federal appeals court to limit eligibility under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.