Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Antitrust counterclaims in patent infringement litigation: clarifying the Supreme Court's enigmatic Mercoid decision

Article Abstract:

The author explains the Supreme Court's 1944 holding in Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co., the origin of the controversial use of antitrust counterclaims in patent infringement litigation.The conclusion is that such counterclaims in patent infringement litigation fall into the permissive category under Rule 13(b) and thus may be tried separately if strategically feasible.

Author: Donahey, Teague I.
Publisher: Patent and Trademark Office Society
Publication Name: Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0882-9098
Year: 1999
Interpretation and construction, Antitrust law

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


What it means to "entirely vitiate" a claim element in light of Warner-Jenkinson

Article Abstract:

Issues are discussed regarding the implementation of the Federal Circuit's Warner-Jenkinson holding rejecting a theory of equivalents entirely vitiating a claim limitation. When faced with a claim of infringement by equivalents, patent defendants should use the language of the claims and the intrinsic record to determine the appropriateness of the theory of equivalents.

Author: Allison, Craig Y.
Publisher: Patent and Trademark Office Society
Publication Name: Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0882-9098
Year: 2000
Equivalents doctrine (Patent law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Protecting patents from the beginning: the importance of information disclosure statements during patent prosecution

Article Abstract:

The importance of filing comprehensive information disclosure statements (IDS) to ensure the validity and enforcability of a US patent and during patent prosecution is discussed. The appropriate format to be used, the timeliness of submission and what an IDS must disclose are outlined. The consequences of intentional and unintentional non-disclosure are also discussed.

Author: Juneau, Todd L., MacAlpine, Jill K.
Publisher: Patent and Trademark Office Society
Publication Name: Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0882-9098
Year: 2000

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases, Patent licenses, Patent licensing
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: IRS invites comments on clarifying the effect of INDOPCO on current deductibility. IRS rules that severence pay remains currently deductible after INDOPCO
  • Abstracts: Remarks by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Associate Justice, Supreme Court of the United States. Dedication to Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
  • Abstracts: More accounting method changes granted automatic consent. Prop. regs. clarify reporting payments to attorneys
  • Abstracts: International arbitration agreements: a look behind the scenes. International arbitration agreements in United States courts
  • Abstracts: Pill splitting raises issues of safety and patent coverage; cases upholding single-use limitations might prevent dividing doses, either by commercial outfits or by individuals
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.