Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Art. 2B offers jurisprudence for all forms; proposed U.C.C. article's creative approach to interpreting mass-market licenses can be applied to any standard-form contract

Article Abstract:

Uniform Commercial Code Article 2B's attempt at a new framework for testing enforceability of mass-market contracts has led to much controversy, as under this section a standard form binds a party agreeing to it or manifesting asset, even if ignorant of the terms. The original Art. 2 drafting committee rejected substituting terms thought to be fair by third parties for standard forms, preferring instead to address the most blatant standard-form contract abuses with a section relating to "unconscionability."

Author: Dodd, Jeff C.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1998
Contracts, Forms (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


'Boilerplate' U.S. contracts often miss the mark: contract drafters should keep in mind that German commercial law protects the weaker party

Article Abstract:

Standard contracts adapted for use in another country without reference to differences in national laws may prove unenforceable and even harmful. Germany's Law on General Business Terms tries to protect the weaker party, in part by invalidating many contract provisions if they are imposed without negotiation, nullifying many standard US contract clauses. German law also makes the sale of computer software preferable to its lease or transfer of a right to use, as opposed to US practice.

Author: Nemmers, Barry H., Bartsch, Michael
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
Germany, Contracts (International law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Corporate interests failed to hold sway; this term, the high court handed companies some setbacks in employment and ERISA decisions

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme court did not hand the business community any major victories during the 1996-97 term. In contrast to previous terms, it ruled against corporate interests in several major cases. Cases involving ERISA preemption, pension litigation, Title VII's antiretaliation provision, employment discrimination, and other business matters are profiled and discussed.

Author: Conrad, Robin S.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1997
Pension, health, and welfare funds, Pension Funds & Benefit Plans, Pension Funds, Cases, Employment, Surveys, United States. Supreme Court

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Interpretation and construction, Commercial law
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: ADR clauses in leases call for selective drafting: many, but not all, real estate issues can be resolved quickly by an experienced arbitrator
  • Abstracts: The UCC gets another rewrite; just when you thought you really knew the Uniform Commercial Code, almost every article is undergoing major changes in a major revision
  • Abstracts: Eyeing foreign capital, Indonesia enacts changes; the bankruptcy law, the capital markets and investment rules are principal areas of reform
  • Abstracts: New Microsoft tool is effective - and free! Putting the Web to work. Buying your first litigation support program
  • Abstracts: Decision approving settlement class that included non-federal-question claims focused on lack of need for jury instructions, thus lack of manageability issues
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.