Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Bank holding company/bank combinations

Article Abstract:

IRS Private Letter Ruling 9240026 clarified policy on the acquisition of banks and bank holding companies by other banks and bank holding companies. The IRS declared that it would regard the holding companies' merger as taking place first and that the target bank was therefore already part of the acquiring bank's group even before the target and acquiring banks merged. This decision also shows that the IRS's policy of not ruling on mergers involving bank holding companies can be avoided.

Author: Bloom, Gilbert D.
Publisher: Warren, Gorham & Lamont, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Corporate Taxation
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0094-0593
Year: 1993
Laws, regulations and rules, Mergers, acquisitions and divestments, Bank mergers, Bank holding companies

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Tracking stock ruling

Article Abstract:

The IRS ruled that tracking stock is considered stock in the parent corporation and allowed recapitalization of this stock without income recognition. Tracking stock is stock of a parent corporation that tracks the performance of a subsidiary. Earnings and appreciation may follow the subsidiary, but there are not the voting and liquidation rights that would make the stock stock in the subsidiary. The IRS has classified this subject matter as a no-rule area.

Author: Bloom, Gilbert D.
Publisher: Warren, Gorham & Lamont, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Corporate Taxation
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0094-0593
Year: 1995
Subsidiary corporations, Subsidiaries, Securities, Stock transfer

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


New section 351(e): the "not an investment company" representation for section 351 private letter ruling requests just got tougher

Article Abstract:

The Taxpayer Relief Act's amendment of IRC s. 351(e) means that the usual representations made in requesting private letter rulings, which typically state that transferees are not investment companies, could in fact lead to unexpected tax consequences. Transactions previously considered tax-free exchanges might be considered investment company transfer under the revised law.

Author: Bloom, Gilbert D.
Publisher: Warren, Gorham & Lamont, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Corporate Taxation
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0094-0593
Year: 1998
United States, Investment companies

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Taxation
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Plan administrator not required to investigate state court's application of state law in issuing domestic relations order
  • Abstracts: Avoiding malpractice claims in planning and administration. Marshaling assets when a client chooses multiple fiduciaries
  • Abstracts: Parental consent; stringent Miss. law passes muster. On and on; will the new amendments cut Rule 11 litigation down to size?
  • Abstracts: 'Comp' overhaul struck down; battle raging in Texas. The dead rise again in the courtroom; historical figures get their day. Legal 'ghostbusters' say serious issues are at stake
  • Abstracts: Venture capital fund investments. Retirement plan provisions of the Taxpayer Relief Act. Retirement plan investments in company stock
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.