Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Bryan Cave faces second malpractice suit

Article Abstract:

The Los Angeles branch of Bryan, Cave, McPheeters and McRoberts has been sued twice for malpractice regarding the firm's defense of a discount store allegedly guilty of depressing the cost of upper-end hair care products. The second suit was filed by Los Angeles' Van Petten and Holen and alleged that Bryan, Cave did not advise client 99 Cents Only Stores of conflict of interest problems. These may have been present because the firm was representing other defendants with similar causes of action at the same time.

Author: Policzer, Milt
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1993
Legal services, Attorneys, Lawyers, Malpractice, Legal malpractice, Bryan Cave L.L.P.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


L.A. firm slapped with suits; doing deals with clients, (Mitchell, Silberberg and Knupp)

Article Abstract:

Tax Attorney Robert C. Kopple of Mitchell, Silberberg and Knupp is being sued for alleged conflicts of interest and fraud relating to real estate investments worth millions of dollars. These were investments in a citrus and almond farm in Fresno County, California. The investors allege that Kopple neglected to inform them of conflicts of interest in representing them while at the same time holding an interest in the investment and representing the company which handled packing and marketing for the farm.

Author: Policzer, Milt
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1992
Real estate investment, Real estate investments, Fraud, Conflict of interests (Attorneys), Conflicts of interest (Lawyers)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Hammer's will power: Armand Hammer's ex-lovers, children and relatives all want a piece of the estate

Article Abstract:

Ex-mistresses and family members are locked in a will contest regarding the estate of the late industrialist Armand Hammer. The ex-mistresses, Bettye Murphy and Hillary Martha Gibson, claim Hammer promised to support them for the rest of their lives. Bettye Murphy had a child fathered by Hammer named Victoria Varela who is specifically disinherited in the will. Another suit charges that Hammer made his fortune using the money of his wife, Frances, and that she was defrauded out of her share.

Author: Policzer, Milt
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1992
Finance, Wills, Hammer, Armand

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Attorney malpractice in claims handling and settlement strategy: avoiding the road to liability. Punitive damages: an analysis of the states' response to B.M.W. v. Gore
  • Abstracts: 'Frantic' after AIDS news, she becomes a crusader. Spill accord draws fire; plaintiff's lawyers are unhappy with terms; do they violate new state law?
  • Abstracts: Battered child's defense; youths who killed relatives offer evidence of abuse with mixed results. Liability for spouse's abuse; new theory holds mothers accountable for failing to protect children
  • Abstracts: A popular AG is lesson in image; as lawyers suffer a decline in polls, Janet Reno and ABA leaders offer strategy
  • Abstracts: The big freeze. Protecting pensions; solo practitioners advised to add employees to their plans
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.