Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

"Bumped" employee not redundant

Article Abstract:

The British Employment Appeals Tribunal ruled in Church v. West Lancashire NHS Trust that an employee dismissed and replaced by someone whose different position was declared redundant was not himself redundant. Redundancy must, the tribunal ruled, relate to the work done by the dismissed employee himself. The Employment Appeals Tribunal thus finds that the statutory definition of a redundancy for either unfair dismissal or redundancy payments purposes does not include transferred redundancies.

Publisher: Eclipse Publications Ltd.
Publication Name: Industrial Relations Law Bulletin
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0969-3637
Year: 1998

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Seymour-Smith update

Article Abstract:

Industrial tribunals have diverse ways of handling unfair dismissal cases in the United Kingdom, varying from the decision of ex parte Seymour-Smith. In that case, a qualifying period of two years employment was invalidated. However, that Court of Appeal decision is on appeal to the House of Lords. Decisions of other tribunals are discussed, covering cases brought by fired workers who were employed less than two years.

Publisher: Eclipse Publications Ltd.
Publication Name: Industrial Relations Law Bulletin
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0969-3637
Year: 1996
Unfair labor practices

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


White woman told to discriminate against black people was herself racially discriminated against

Article Abstract:

The British Court of Appeal's ruling in Weathersfield Ltd. v. Sargent held that by constructively dismissing a white employee who left employment with a vehicle rental company due to objection to its policy of not renting vehicles to blacks suffered from unlawful race discrimination. The company treated her less favorably than employees who did apply this policy, and the treatment was on racial grounds.

Publisher: Eclipse Publications Ltd.
Publication Name: Industrial Relations Law Bulletin
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0969-3637
Year: 1999
United Kingdom, Race discrimination

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United Kingdom, Cases, Employee dismissals, Employment terminations, Employment at will
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Court orders. California court reins in tort; doctrine of peculiar risk. Calif. high court agrees to hear HMO arbitration case; the court will decide if Kaiser's arbitration system violates public policy
  • Abstracts: Compensation limits contravened Equal Treatment Directive. Positive discrimination may be permissible under EC law
  • Abstracts: The impact of after-acquired evidence in employment discrimination cases after McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Company
  • Abstracts: Beat the clock. Watch out for the tax attack; when it comes to capital gains, procrastination can be a virtue
  • Abstracts: Black lawyer's life, suit told by a white author; new book by a WSJ editor tells of a Harvard Law grad who sued Katten Muchin
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.