Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Calif. course wins a skirmish in the battle of the bar reviews

Article Abstract:

The 10th US Circuit Court of Appeals recently reversed a federal district court and remanded for trial a lawsuit brought three years ago by Multistate Legal Studies (MLS) against the providers of the BAR/BRI bar review course. MLS, better known as PMBR, claims BAR/BRI violated the Sherman Act by tying in its multistate supplementary courses to its core, single-state ones, and using other anticompetitive measures. BAR/BRI says it has acted fairly and that its increasing market share reflects quality, not market power.

Author: Rovella, David E.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
California, Study and teaching, Bar examinations, Multistate Legal Studies Inc., Bar/BRI Inc.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Circuit ruling challenges 'Bakke,' threatens law school diversity

Article Abstract:

The US Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit has issued a controversial affirmative action ruling in Hopwood v. State of Texas. The court ruled that race as a criterion for admission should be narrowly used as a remedy for past wrongs, not to achieve diversity. The court felt that using race for the latter reason was a 14th amendment violation. Proponents of affirmative action have spoken of fear that this case signaled the practice's end.

Author: Rovella, David E.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
Affirmative action, Law schools, Law school admissions

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Gay groups are angry at sexual preference ruling; Cincinnati law contradicts high court case, they say

Article Abstract:

Gay rights groups said that a US Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit ruling squelching discrimination suits based on sexual orientation was a renegade action, contravening rejection of such discrimination by courts and voters across the country. The proposed Employee Non-Discrimination Act would prohibit sexual orientation-based employment discrimination in a manner similar to other bans on discrimination.

Author: Rovella, David E.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1997
Laws, regulations and rules, Discrimination against gays, Employment discrimination

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, United States
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Court orders. California court reins in tort; doctrine of peculiar risk. Calif. high court agrees to hear HMO arbitration case; the court will decide if Kaiser's arbitration system violates public policy
  • Abstracts: Some suggestions for maximizing the benefits of the provisional application. The best mode inquiry: resolution of legal issues by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
  • Abstracts: American corporations and the economic future of South Africa. New challenges for corporate responsibility
  • Abstracts: Drugs warp the system. Whose is the privilege?
  • Abstracts: Is the camel's nose in the social security tent? Where are the savings? Where's the growth?
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.