Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Can U.S. courts be good sports?

Article Abstract:

The power of state and federal judges to review the policies of sports organizations is being debated after the US Supreme Court ruled that sprinter Butch Reynolds could compete in the U.S. Olympic Track and Field Trials in spite of his two-year suspension from his sport because of drug use. The International Amateur Athletic Federation (IAAF) waived its rule that athletes who competed against Reynolds might be barred from the Olympics and told U.S. track officials to press for legislation barring the courts from such disputes.

Author: Blum, Andrew
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1992
Competitions, Judicial review, Drugs and athletes, Track and field athletics, Track and field

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Ice cream mogul leaves legacy of discord; Tom Carvel named seven as trust overseers, but they can't seem to agree on anything

Article Abstract:

The seven executors named by Tom Carvel to oversee the foundation he created have taken a series of disputes to court, depriving his widow of funds and preventing effective mgmt. Carvel left $80 million to his wife, much of it in a foundation set up to avoid estate taxes. Four of the executors, including his widow, have resigned or been suspended, and the NY Attorney General's office has accused two officials of misusing funds. The disputes arise out of dislike between various of the executors.

Author: Blum, Andrew
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
Claims against decedents' estates, New York (State), Carvel, Tom

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


N.J. high court: HMOs can be sued on care; duty to coordinate medical teams can trigger liability for managed-care organizations

Article Abstract:

A ruling by the New Jersey Supreme Court appears to further open the way for patients and doctors to sue health maintenance organizations (HMOs) over malpractice. The 7-0 decision on Apr 18, 1995, said the plaintiff, a doctor successfully sued for malpractice, could not pursue his suit, but only because he cross-filed against the HMO too late. Some HMO spokesmen said the ruling does not break new ground, but other lawyers disagreed.

Author: Blum, Andrew
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
New Jersey, Managed care plans (Medical care), Malpractice, Health maintenance organizations

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: A 'good soldier' stands accused of assault: a night of drinking leads to charges of sexual assault, but was the act consensual?
  • Abstracts: Matters of timing: courts seek to sort out confusion over limitations periods in education act. Matters of life and death; debate grows over euthanasia
  • Abstracts: Employers increasingly rely on the 'same-actor inference' as a defense in some bias lawsuits in which the hirer and firer are the same person
  • Abstracts: The return of the nativists: inspired by California's Prop. 187, activists seek to tap anti-alien fervor. TV stars, managers tussle; cases reignite criticism of agent laws in New York, California
  • Abstracts: DNA report raises concerns; study backs genetic evidence, but questions reliability of labs, statistics
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.