Cases T-69/00, FIAMM and FIAMM Technologies, T-151/00, Le Laboratorie du Bain, T-301/00, Fremaux, T-320/00, CD Cartondruck AG, T-383/00, Beamglow Ltd and T-135/01, Giorgio Fedon & Figli S.p.A., Fedon S.r.I. and Fedon America USA Inc., Judgments of 14 December 2005, Grand Chamber of the Court of First Instance, nyr.

Article Abstract:

The Court of First Instance rejected as unfounded many actions in which European traders sought to hold the Community liable for damages allegedly caused by the US' retaliatory measures, which were imposed in accordance with the law of the World Trade Organization because of an identified breach of WTO law being continued by the Community on 14th December 2005. The applicants in the six cases have based their claim for compensation, first on the CommunityEs breaches of WTO law, secondly, on the Community having caused a disproportionate financial burden or loss suffered by the retaliation victims.

United States, Europe, World Trade Organization, Breach of contract

---

Case T-317/02, Federation des industries condimentaires de France (FICF) and others v. Commission, judgment of 14 December 2004 by the First Chamber (extended composition) of the Court of First Instance, not yet reported

Article Abstract:

The Court of First Instance has rendered the first judgment on the correct interpretation and application of the Trade Barrier Regulation (TBR) in the so-called Prepared Mustard case on 14th December 2004. The importance of the Prepared Mustard case lies in particular in the fact that it is the first to shed light on the TBR.

France, Administration of General Economic Programs, FOOD AND KINDRED PRODUCTS, Trade Barriers, Company legal issue, Cases, Food industry, Food and beverage production/distribution software

---

The Green paper on damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules and beyond: reflections on the utility and feasibility of stimulating private enforcement through legislative action

Article Abstract:

The article discusses about the Green paper on presented in December 2005, on legislative damage actions inducing private enforcement for breach of EC antitrust rule and establishes that enforcement of antitrust damages through legislative action is required and is possible.

Management dynamics, Management, Interpretation and construction, International agencies, International organizations, Company business management, Antitrust law (International law)

Similar abstracts:

• Abstracts: Case C-17/03, VEMW, APX en Eneco N.v. v. DTE, Judgment of the Full Court of 7 June 2005, nyr. Institutions and long term planning: lessons from the California electricity crisis

This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.