Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Cases refine definition of federal powers: three significant decisions this term examined the appropriate role of a central government

Article Abstract:

The Supreme Court in its 1994-95 term ruled 5-4 on three important cases concerning the federal govt's authority and constitutional limits. In US v Lopez it found no constitutional authority for Congress to outlaw gun possession near schools, limiting the Commerce Clause's broad writ. In US Term Limits v Thornton it invalidated AR's efforts to keep past US senators and representatives off the ballot. In Adarand Constructors v Pena it applied to federal affirmative-action programs the same limits states face.

Author: Rotunda, Ronald D.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
Affirmative action, Gun control

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Lopez pops feds' ballooning powers

Article Abstract:

The recent US Supreme Court decision in US v Lopez correctly recognizes the trend to unlimited interpretation of the commerce clause, and makes the first effort to rectify that trend. Since 1937, when the Court's ruling in NLRB v Jones & Laughlin Steel broke with 150 years of tradition, the Court has deferred completely to the self-definition of congressional powers. The Lopez ruling is indeed radical and activist, in the best senses of each, and it is a vital step to restoring true federalism in the US.

Author: Huffman, James L.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
Legislative power

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


A Czech window on ethics

Article Abstract:

American attorneys helped their Czech colleagues develop the Czech Rules of Professional Conduct. These rules should be a model for the rest of Eastern Europe, are designed as a protection for clients and are in some respects more progressive than the American rules. The rules require the lawyers to have malpractice insurance to protect clients from bad service, ban attorney discipline for speech unconnected with conduct and have a relatively generous approach to foreign competition.

Author: Rotunda, Ronald D.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
Legal services, Attorneys, Offices of Lawyers, Laws, regulations and rules, Czech Republic, Lawyers, Comparative analysis, Legal ethics, Czechoslovakia

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Interpretation and construction, Cases, Federalism, Commerce clause (United States. Constitution)
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Do appearances warrant trademark protection? Federal courts are split on the appropriate coverage to be afforded to trade dress
  • Abstracts: The rising impact of environmental mandates on local government. Caution: precautionary principle ahead
  • Abstracts: A case for variable life. Is variable universal life an appropriate funding vehicle for deferred compensation plans?
  • Abstracts: Graduate debt burden grows; of all professionals, law grads have compiled the worst loan default record. The debt crisis
  • Abstracts: CD-ROM systems suit law firm storage needs; their high storage capacities, lower cost and ease of network access facilitate attorney use
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.