Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Choosing sides; California court says employer is not liable if it acts in good faith to fire an accused sexual harasser

Article Abstract:

The California Supreme Court ruled in Cotran v. Rollins Hudig Hall International, a 1998 case, that a company dismissing an an executive accused of sexual harassment could not be held liable if it did so on a reasonable, good-faith belief that the allegations were true. California businesses were alarmed by this ruling as the case meant that firing an alleged harasser, not just keeping one employed, was now a liability. Harassment investigators were relieved as they believe there are more harassers unpunished than innocents falsely accused.

Author: Higgins, Michael
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1998
Sexual harassment

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Take the money and sue; plaintiff who kept severance did not waive age-bias claim

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court ruled in Oubre v. Entergy Operations that an employee could file suit alleging that her dismissal violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act even if she had signed a waiver agreeing not to sue. The court ruled that the doctrines of tender back and ratification do not apply to the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA), and an age-claim waiver is not valid unless it complies with the OWBPA.

Author: Higgins, Michael
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1998
Severance pay

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Success has its price; courts ok firing older, higher-paid workers to save money

Article Abstract:

The California Supreme Court let stand an appellate court ruling in Marks v. Loral Corp. in which an older, higher-paid employee who was fired to save the business money and a suit under the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act as well as California's similar state statute resulted. The appellate court opinion shows how wage discrimination law has begun to tilt against employees.

Author: Higgins, Michael
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1998
Employment discrimination

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, California, Employee dismissals, Employment terminations, Employment at will, United States, Age discrimination
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: "Bagging" or "goosing": how the courts are ruling in same-sex sexual harassment claims. From construct to cases: the emergence of the obnoxious employee defense
  • Abstracts: Temporary indebtedness incurred by plan to facilitate sales of employer stock not acquisition indebtedness. DOL final regulations identify when assets become plan assets under ERISA
  • Abstracts: Predispute ADR raises fairness issue; courts have not hesitated to enforce arbitration agreements except when the fairness of the process is compromised
  • Abstracts: Georgia lawyer faces execution; Atlanta public defender fights for a law school buddy accused of murder. There's no dodging crossfire in his job
  • Abstracts: Microsoft is still in the crosshairs; threat of rare state AGs' suit is especially worrisome. Antitrust laws can hit high-tech targets, too
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.