Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Clinton signs bill pre-empting securities suits; new law prevents state court end-run around the 1995 securities law reforms

Article Abstract:

The Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 will mandate trial in federal courts under federal law of securities class actions involving nationally traded securities based on false and misleading statements, and three SEC commissioners, including Chmn Arthur Levitt Jr, endorsed this act. This statute's stated goal is to forestall securities class action suits filed in state courts under state law by the plaintiff's class action bar to end-run the protections to end-run the protections given issuers of securities under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1998
Exclusive and concurrent legislative powers, Preemption (Legislative power)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Corporate crime; attorney-client privilege

Article Abstract:

The attorney-client privilege as applied to corporations is discussed, and its first discussion in a judicial ruling occurred in Upjohn Co. v. United States, where the court found the control group test used by many corporations to be lacking. Justice Department prosecutors are undermining the privilege with their increasing demand that corporations waive it as a prerequisite to resolving criminal cases.

Author: Cohen, Steven M., Bergmann, Joanna L.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 2000
Cases, Confidential communications, Attorney-client privilege, Criminal liability of juristic persons, Juristic persons criminal liability

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Insider trading; SEC cracks down

Article Abstract:

Issues are discussed regarding the SEC's proposed strict liability for insider trading in securities and some federal courts' disagreement with this move, the agency's proposed amendment to Rule 10b-5, which would codify the restriction of trading of those with inside information; and how corporate counsel should advise clients once the new rule is in force.

Author: Cohen, Steven M.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 2000
Remedies, Insider trading in securities, Insider trading (Securities)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Disclosure (Securities law)
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Federal courts disagree on pleading securities fraud; circuits differ on meaning of pleadings requirement for scienter under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
  • Abstracts: Time/billing systems just a browser away; web-based service providers give smaller firms access to sophisticated time-and-billing software they can't usually afford
  • Abstracts: Moving the immovable: protecting real estate from creditor claims. Tax-favored strategies for funding a child's higher education
  • Abstracts: Are May-September suits only ones that will fly? Supreme Court to hear arguments that an older employee can't go to trial when he's replaced by another 'old-timer.'
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.