Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Commercial power and competitor litigation

Article Abstract:

Using litigation as an anti-competitive tactic against a powerful competitor may constitute a claim under the Australian Trade Practices Act 1974, but if the plaintiff-competitor possesses no market power, competition law remedies may not be available. In the US, the sham exception to the Noerr-Pennington doctrine was developed to address attempts to harm competitors under the guise of petitioning the government, but in recent years, the US Supreme Court has narrowed the exception. Interference with contracts and abuse of process torts may be alleged by the competitor being sued.

Author: Welsman, Sandra J.
Publisher: LBC Information Services
Publication Name: Australian Business Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0310-1053
Year: 1996
United States, Cases, Restraint of trade, Frivolous suits (Civil procedure)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The court-room economist in Australian antitrust litigation: an underutilised resource?

Article Abstract:

Economists can be of help in Australian anti-trust litigation in a number of ways in which they have been underutilized in the past. Economists have been accepted as explaining statutory definitions of economic terms and economic theory, but they have not been used much to apply theory to the facts of a case or to explain observed behavior. Procedural reforms such as provision of a mechanism allowing judges to circumvent certain rules of evidence will allow a greater role for economists in the court.

Author: Yeung, Karen
Publisher: LBC Information Services
Publication Name: Australian Business Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0310-1053
Year: 1992
Analysis, Evidence, Expert, Expert evidence

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Choice of law in tort in domestic and international litigation

Article Abstract:

The choice of law rule in tort in Australia is the same as in international tort cases except where claims are governed by another country's law. Where the rule is satisfied and Australian law is found applicable, plaintiffs will be limited only by the existing civil liability of the place where the tort occurred. An examination of the Australian High Court judgments on the rule can help resolve some of the uncertainty regarding it.

Author: Dutson, Stuart
Publisher: LBC Information Services
Publication Name: Australian Business Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0310-1053
Year: 1998
Conflict of laws, international, Tort law

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Australia, Economic aspects, Antitrust law
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Enforcing foreign arbitration awards. The role of party autonomy in international arbitration
  • Abstracts: Codetermination and corporate governance in a multinational business enterprise. Corporate governance in America 1950-2000: major changes but uncertain benefits
  • Abstracts: Antitrust law and nonprofit organizations: the law school accreditation case. Kodak decision revitalizes tying claims
  • Abstracts: Can liability extend to computer service repair persons outside of the remedies available within the seller's maintenance agreement?
  • Abstracts: From control over one's body to control over one's body parts: extending the doctrine of informed consent. Copyright protection, privacy rights, and the fair use doctrine: the post-Salinger decade reconsidered
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.