Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Conception, testing, reduction to practice: when is it really on sale?

Article Abstract:

The point at which an invention exists and is capable of being sold within the meaning of Patent Code section 102(b) is not clear except where tangibility and operability of items are evident. Section 102(b) requires patent applications to be filed within a year of the sale or offering for sale of inventions. The Federal Circuit has consistently issued nonuniform opinions regarding the issue of extent of development. The US Supreme Court may resolve the problem as it has agreed to review Pfaff v. Wells.

Author: Mueller, Janice M.
Publisher: Patent and Trademark Office Society
Publication Name: Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0882-9098
Year: 1998
Product introduction, Inventors

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Only obvious variations infringe

Article Abstract:

The most recent Federal Circuit rulings suggest the use of 35 USC 112 as a tool for assessing infringement in terms of the obviousness of the accused device in view of the patent disclosure, a key departure from patent lawyers' understanding of the way patent infringement is determined. Drafters of patent applications should broadly disclosure the invention and describe the numerous embodiments so that more accused products will be similar to those described in the patent.

Author: Whitmyer, Wesley W., Jr.
Publisher: Patent and Trademark Office Society
Publication Name: Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0882-9098
Year: 1998

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


A Rich legacy

Article Abstract:

A testimonial to the late Judge Giles S. Rich of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is given. Rich was also a legal scholar with 50 years worth of writings, and a person with a passion for technology. A testimony to Rich's approachability and humility are also given.

Author: Mueller, Janice M.
Publisher: Patent and Trademark Office Society
Publication Name: Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0882-9098
Year: 1999
Officials and employees, Judges, Testimonial, United States. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Rich, Giles S.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Interpretation and construction, Patent law
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Adoption and the Constitution: are adoptive parents really "strangers without rights"? A rape in cyberspace or how an evil clown, a Haitian trickster spirit, two wizards, and a cast of dozens turned a database into a society
  • Abstracts: Interim relief in international arbitration: enforcement is a substantial problem. Commercial arbitration gains favor in Mexico in aftermath of NAFTA treaty
  • Abstracts: Interaction of the estate tax marital deduction and qualified plan and IRA benefits
  • Abstracts: The constitutional committment to legislative adjudication in the early American tradition. Adjudication and its discontents: coherence and conciliation in federal Indian law
  • Abstracts: Allocable share of discretionary profit-sharing contribution is s. 411(d)(6) protected benefit. Not all protected benefits need be preserved after trustee-to-trustee transfer
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.