Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Condition treatable with medication not a "disability" under ADA

Article Abstract:

The US District Court for Kansas ruled in Murphy v. United Parcel Service that the plaintiff failed to state a wrongful termination claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act because he was not disabled and was not able to perform the job's essential functions. The plaintiff had hypertension and claimed that his disability should be judged when in an unmedicated state, consistent with Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Interpretive Guidelines. The Court rejected that portion of the Guidelines and ruled that disability should be judged while medicated.

Publisher: Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
Publication Name: Tax Management Compensation Planning Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-8607
Year: 1997
Discrimination against disabled persons, Handicapped discrimination

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Mitigation of damages is not required when participant's claim for benefits under ERISA plan is improperly denied due to procedural errors

Article Abstract:

The U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Schleibaum v. Kmart Corp agreed with the10th Circuit Court of Appeal's decision in a prior ERISA case that employees do not need to mitigate damages where they were not properly notified of benefit denials or other procedural errors occurred resulting in inadequate claimant information. Kmart's argument that it substantially complied with ERISA claim procedures was rejected by the court which found the claimant lacked the necessary information to perfect his appeal.

Publisher: Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
Publication Name: Tax Management Compensation Planning Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-8607
Year: 1998
United States, Employee Benefits & Services, Laws, regulations and rules, Human resource management, Influence, Damages, Damages (Law), Notice (Law), Extenuating circumstances

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Salary continuation plan terminated by operation of law following RTC takeover of failed thrift

Article Abstract:

Rice v Resolution Trust Corp concerned a fired CEO of a bank under Resolution Trust Corp (RTC) receivership seeking damages for a salary continuation agreement termination. The court held this agreement to be a labor contract under federal banking law, which meant the contract had been terminated when the RTC became receiver of the institution, which Happened before the executive's firing.

Publisher: Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
Publication Name: Tax Management Compensation Planning Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-8607
Year: 1992
Interpretation and construction, Banking law

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases, Employee dismissals, Employment terminations, Employment at will, Employee benefits
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Learning to use the mediation process - a guide for lawyers. Making commercial arbitration faster and more efficient
  • Abstracts: Continuing legal education. CLE directory
  • Abstracts: Court review of arbitration. Court review of arbitration: some practical observations. Judge Reinhardt's primer on labor arbitration: Stead Motors and public policy judicial review
  • Abstracts: ERISA control groups: the creeping spread of liability. Workplace violence: sources of liability, warning signs, and ways to mitigate damages
  • Abstracts: Employee can sue under ERISA s. 510 even though all benefits covered by ERISA have been received. Labor opines on status of union emergency relief fund as an employee benefit plan
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.