Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Constitutional law - equal protection - D.C. Circuit upholds military discharge based on a statement of homosexual orientation

Article Abstract:

The D.C. Circuit decision in Steffan v. Perry suggests that the status/conduct distinction used by gay rights advocates should be abandoned. The court used a similar argument to justify inferences about conduct based on homosexual status in upholding a military discharge based on stated homosexual orientation. The status/conduct distinction tends to promote objectification of homosexual identity and unwarranted assumptions about its implications. Gay-rights litigators should consider other strategies based on substantive due process or First Amendment rights.

Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1995
Military discharge

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Is international law really state law?

Article Abstract:

The hornbook law rule that customary international law should be treated as federal law by US decisionmaking authorities has recently been incorrectly questioned by revisionist scholars who would prefer state law jurisdiction. Revisionist arguments claiming violations of democratic principles and constitutional doctrine do not stand scrutiny. Human rights litigation may be the primary target of these failed arguments. The traditional rule is constitutionally authorized and is proper from a policy perspective.

Author: Koh, Harold Hongju
Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1998
Analysis, Interpretation and construction, International law, Federal jurisdiction, Customary law, international, states

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


International law - human rights - European Court of Human Rights rules that British military's discharge of homosexuals is illegal

Article Abstract:

The author discusses two opinions handed down on Sept. 27, 1999 by the European Court of Human Rights where the court held illegal the United Kingdom's discharge of military personnel on the basis of their homosexuality.

Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 2000
United Kingdom, European Union, Discrimination against gays

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases, Gay military personnel, Human rights
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Geneva Convention on protection of civilians - reassignment of residence to Gaza Strip - evidence of security risk
  • Abstracts: Tenth Circuit holds that severance agreement is top-hat plan. SEC refuses to issue no action letters on filing requirements for some large employer deferred compensation plans
  • Abstracts: Establishment Clause - religious displays on public property - Colorado Supreme Court upholds display of Ten Commandments on public property
  • Abstracts: New safety law would protect under-18s. The enforcement record of the HSE's Field Operations Division. HSC launches DTI-inspired deregulation enforcement initiative with more red tape
  • Abstracts: Checklist for internal investigations - practical pointers to remember during an internal investigation. Between a rock and a hard place: internal corporate investigations and the attorney-client privilege
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.