Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Constitutional law - free exercise of religion - Alaska Supreme Court holds that housing anti-discrimination laws protecting unmarried couples withstand a free exercise challenge by a religious landlord

Article Abstract:

The Alaska Supreme Court in Swanner v. Anchorage Equal Rights Commission too easily found a compelling state interest in eradicating marital status discrimination in housing sufficient to outweigh a landlord's right to free exercise of religion in refusing to rent to unmarried couples. The court overlooked existing state law that discriminates on the basis of marital status in other areas. The court could have reached the same result by drawing on the unmarried couple's right to privacy, a position which would have more adequately fulfilled the compelling interest requirement.

Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1995
Unmarried couples

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Constitutional law - article III justiciability - Ninth Circuit holds that landlords may not assert pre-enforcement free exercise challenge to antidiscrimination statutes

Article Abstract:

The author discusses the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit's decision in Thomas v. Anchorage Equal Rights Commission, in which the court denied declaratory and injunctive relief to landlords openly challenging laws requiring them to rent to unmarried couples in violation of their religious beliefs.

Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 2001
Landlords, Case Note, Judgments, Declaratory, Declaratory judgments

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Antidiscrimination and accommodation

Article Abstract:

The effects of accommodation requirements and prohibitions of intentional discrimination on employers are compared.

Author: Jolls, Christine
Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 2001
Laws, regulations and rules, Employer liability, Employment discrimination

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, Freedom of religion, Housing discrimination, United States
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Constitutional law - procedural due process - Pennsylvania Supreme Court holds sentence-enhancement provisions of "Megan's Law" unconstitutional - Commonwealth v. Williams
  • Abstracts: Arbitration injunctions rise abroad; when courts in developing nations enjoin hearings to protect local companies, going forward can put resulting rewards at risk
  • Abstracts: Will a lack of jobs doom welfare reform? Corporations' misguided obsession with shareholder wealth. The dilemma of Internet pornography
  • Abstracts: When bondholders' votes upset a plan. Effect of participant's insolvency unclear; litigation continues as to whether creditors can reach plan interests
  • Abstracts: The time has come: time-billing vs. value-billing. Reach out and call someone: the wireless telephone is an indispensable tool
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.