Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Contract law - employment-at-will - N.Y. Court of Appeals implies reporting requirement into law firm-associate employment relationship

Article Abstract:

The New York Court of Appeals in Wieder v Skala held that compliance with ethical standards was implied in the employment contract of a law firm and therefore that an associate fired for insisting that the firm report unethical conduct of another associate could sue for breach of contract. Unfortunately, the court relied on a narrow contractual analysis, which left uncertainty in several areas. The court did not specify which ethical rules are implied in the employment contract and did not justify placing the burden of proof on the employee.

Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1993
Law firms, Legal ethics

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


First Amendment - patronage terminations - Fourth Circuit holds that deputy sheriffs may be fired because of political affiliation

Article Abstract:

The US 4th Circuit Court of Appeals held in Jenkins v. Medford that sheriffs are policymakers whose employment can be terminated if their political affiliation compromises the carrying out of a new administration's objectives. Public interest outweighs sheriffs' rights regarding political affiliation. The result in Jenkins v. Medford is the result of the US Supreme Court's inconsistent policy regarding employment termination of public employees for their political affiliations and activities.

Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1998
Patronage, Political, Political patronage

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Statutory interpretations - Americans with Disabilities Act - Fourth Circuit holds that asymptomatic HIV cannot constitute a disability

Article Abstract:

The US 4th Circuit Court of Appeals in 1997's Runnebaum v. NationsBank of Maryland improperly held that persons with asymptomatic human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are per se not protected by the Americans with Disabilities Act. The ruling reflects a disregard for judicial authority and the statutory language. Asymptomatic HIV would fall within the protected category under EEOC guidelines interpreting the statute.

Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1998
HIV infection, HIV infections, Discrimination against disabled persons, Handicapped discrimination

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, Employee dismissals, Employment terminations, Employment at will, United States
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Survey of 92 key companies using ADR to settle employment disputes. Just cause in the arbitration of sexual harassment cases
  • Abstracts: Florida clarifies enforcement of noncompetes. Choice of law in franchise relationships: staying within bounds
  • Abstracts: Shoring up malpractice insurance; the importance of prior acts coverage and extended reporting endorsements. The right amount of coverage: taking inventory of risks helps determine malpractice insurance limits
  • Abstracts: A law run wild; conservative lawmaker seeks asset forfeiture limits. Walsh winds up probe; controversy comes with the territory for independent counsel
  • Abstracts: Two new schools pop up in Fla., but some doubt they're needed. Educators, lawyers and judges discuss implementing 'MacCrate.' (ABA's MacCrate Report calling for changed relationship between practicing attorneys and law schools)
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.