Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Corporate introspection in the nineties: "to thine own self be true."

Article Abstract:

Public companies should carefully consider what documents should be generated and the need for self-evaluations because of the general anti-corporate public attitude, which is reflected in federal law and courts. Corporations should assume that any document can become public information in a suit and use this assumption to control what documents are created. Therefore, while self-evaluations help the corporation prevent wrongdoing, privacy and confidentiality issues must be considered before any actions are taken.

Author: Morley, Matt T., Pitt, Harvey
Publisher: West Group
Publication Name: Securities Regulation Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0097-9554
Year: 1993
Analysis, Corporations, Confidential communications, Discovery (Law), Privileges and immunities

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Personal trading by portfolio managers revisited: the Institute's recommendations a year later

Article Abstract:

The Investment Company Institute's 1994 recommendations on voluntary restraints on portfolio managers' personal trading had been adopted by many mutual funds by 1995. A survey suggests the recommendations are base-line standards that will become standard industry practice. Companies departing from the recommendations could place themselves at risk so they should document reasons for modifying or rejecting the recommendations. Non-investment companies' advisers may also find the recommendations useful.

Author: Pitt, Harvey, Fornelli, Cynthia M.
Publisher: Africa-America-Institute
Publication Name: Annual Institute on Securities Regulation
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0195-5756
Year: 1995
Securities industry, Mutual funds, Insider trading in securities, Insider trading (Securities)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


More than "classical GAAS": audits and corporate illegality under the Litigation Reform Act

Article Abstract:

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 changed the reporting standard for auditors. Under the act, they are required to use auditing procedures developed to discover illegal acts by their clients and, if the clients do not take remedial action, auditors are to report their findings directly to the SEC. These requirements are not part of generally accepted auditing standards. Steps auditors should take to handle these requirements are discussed.

Author: Pitt, Harvey, Hardison, David B., Bard, Lawrence R.
Publisher: Africa-America-Institute
Publication Name: Annual Institute on Securities Regulation
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0195-5756
Year: 1996
Standards, Auditing, Auditors

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Contingent liabilities in section 351 transactions: the IRS limits the application of Holdcroft. Sidestepping the business purpose test for corporate spin-offs
  • Abstracts: Monopoly and competition in the supply and exchange of money. Twenty-one years of antitrust injury: down the alley with Brunswick v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat
  • Abstracts: Facing the final exit. Yes: a matter of choice. No: preserve traditional restraints
  • Abstracts: Issues facing directors in corporate groups. Directors' duties to prevent insolvent trading. Farewell to the sleeping director - the modern judicial and legislative approach to directors' duties of care, skill and diligence
  • Abstracts: Equal access to information sought; in outlying areas, law libraries are still few and far between. 'Low-growth' collections pay off; some firms use technology to control the size of libraries
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.