Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Corporate law - a safe harbor proposal to define the limits of directors' fiduciary duty to creditors in the "vicinity of insolvency." (Case Note)

Article Abstract:

The court decided in Lyonnais v. Pathe that a director's fiduciary duties to creditors arise when the corporation is in the 'vicinity of insolvency,' but establishes no definition for this 'vicinity.' The use of a Z-score in determining when this vicinity is reached could ease the minds of both directors and creditors by establishing some standard. Z-scores have been proven indicators of financial status and would provide a safe harbor within which corporate directors could manage their duties to the board and the creditors.

Author: Jelisavcic, Vladimir
Publisher: University of Iowa Journal of Corporation Law
Publication Name: The Journal of Corporation Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0360-795X
Year: 1992
Corporate directors, Debt financing (Corporations), Debt financing, Fiduciary duties

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


UNCITRAL Model Law on cross-border insolvency: procedural approach to a substantive problem

Article Abstract:

The Working Group appointed by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law issued the Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvencies. The Model Law seeks to leave the substantive bankruptcy law of each country adopting it intact while providing procedures that will ensure foreign businesses equal access to each country's substantive law. That the Model Law's virtues outweigh its defects should persuade the US and other countries to adopt it.

Author: Cronin, Matthew T.
Publisher: University of Iowa Journal of Corporation Law
Publication Name: The Journal of Corporation Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0360-795X
Year: 1999
United States, International aspects, Bankruptcy law

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Presumptive business judgment, substantive good faith, litigation control: vindicating the socioeconomic meaning of Harhen v. Brown

Article Abstract:

The author discusses a series of cases in Massachusetts involving the power of a corporate committee or board to control frivolous litigation by minority shareholders. Topics include the extent of judicial oversight required, good faith, and business judgements.

Author: Hutchison, Harry G.
Publisher: University of Iowa Journal of Corporation Law
Publication Name: The Journal of Corporation Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0360-795X
Year: 2001
Massachusetts, States, Minority stockholders

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, Corporation law
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Fiduciary duties derailed? Appropriation of directors' duties in the battle for control of Conrail. Revisiting the import of shareholder consent for corporate fiduciary loyalty obligations
  • Abstracts: The Forest Service, water yield and community stability: defining the contours of an agency commitment to include land grant communities in the Timber Management Program
  • Abstracts: What happens to a license for intellectual property when one party to the agreement files for bankruptcy? The answer depends on the court involved
  • Abstracts: The extraterritoriality of the Bankruptcy Code: will the borders contain the code? The new European law on international insolvencies: a German perspective
  • Abstracts: SEC pays attention to increase in online investing; agency has examined ways to monitor electronic markets and to encourage wider participation
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.