Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Court sides with lawyer on expenses; Ninth Circuit says deductions are permissible in some contingency-fee cases

Article Abstract:

The 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals upheld lawyer James F. Boccardo's revised method of billing clients in contingency-fee cases to make litigation expenses deductible. In 1987 Boccardo lost a challenge to the IRS, which said billing for costs plus one-third of the remainder of a judgment made the costs into a loan. He now bills a flat 40%, regardless of expenses. The finding may set off a flurry of new challenges by contingency-fee lawyers. Boccardo, 83, heads a prominent San Jose, CA, personal-injury firm.

Author: MacLachlan, Claudia
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
Taxation, Tax deductions, Costs (Law), Legal fees, Contingency fees

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Did Business Week fold too easily? Its strategy to publish sealed documents proves unsettling to some media lawyers

Article Abstract:

Business Week's success in getting a prior restraint on publication lifted may have come at too high a cost, for both the magazine itself and the whole publishing industry. The confidential source for the story ended up getting disclosed, the magazine accused him of lying under oath, and the district court ruling could hurt journalists nationwide unless the 6th US District Court of Appeals overturns it. Court hearings into how Business Week got material that was under seal raise particular concern.

Author: MacLachlan, Claudia
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
Periodical Publishers, Periodicals, Business & Trade Publications, Laws, regulations and rules, Confidential communications, Journalistic privilege, Professional journals, Trade journals, Prior restraint, Business Week (Periodical)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


D.C. Circuit tensions flare up

Article Abstract:

District of Columbia Circuit Court Judge James L. Buckley has called for an investigation into the leaking of former colleague Clarence Thomas' opinion in a sexual harassment case. The leak occurred while Thomas was undergoing nomination hearings before the Senate. The opinion in Lamprecht v. Federal Communications Commission was issued Feb 19, 1992, several months after Thomas' ascension to the High Court. Buckley issued his call for an investigation in his concurring opinion.

Author: MacLachlan, Claudia
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1992
Political aspects, Beliefs, opinions and attitudes, Ethical aspects, Media coverage, Sex discrimination, Government and the press, Press policy, Judicial opinions, Thomas, Clarence

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Judicial review of agency actions in a period of diminishing agency resources. The inherent limits on judicial control of agency discretion: the D.C. Circuit and the nondelegation doctrine
  • Abstracts: May I have my balance please? Allocation of payments in bankruptcy cases. Lien stripping under Russian bankruptcy law: Is it fair?
  • Abstracts: Court reconsiders reverse engineering and fair use; 9th Circuit looks at final works, not at intermediates as it did in 1992, but the result is the same
  • Abstracts: Chicago takes it on the chin: imperfect information could play a crucial role in the post-Kodak world
  • Abstracts: Constitutional law - First Amendment - Fourth Circuit rules that a teacher's selection of school curriculum is not protected speech
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.