Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Courts, Congress re-examine nondrug products; makers of dietary supplements now can tout health benefits with less FDA interference

Article Abstract:

The 1994 Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act allows manufacturers to make certain health claims for dietary supplements without petitioning the FDA. These include statements claiming a benefit related to a classical nutrient deficiency disease; declarations of general well-being from consumption of a nutrient or other dietary ingredient; and claims about the role of a nutrient or dietary ingredient with respect to the structure or function of the human body.

Author: Rubin, Howard M.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1999
United States, Dietary supplements

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Courts examine whether judicial review of arbitration awards can be expanded by contract and whether federal agencies can agree to binding arbitration

Article Abstract:

Companies should keep in mind when drafting arbitration clauses that their judicial review tends to be extremely limited. For example, people in the securities industry or franchisees may feel it is in their interest to provide for more judicial review. Limited review is consistent with the professed goals of arbitration, namely, speed, lesser expense and finality. Federal courts have split on whether such review is permitted.

Author: Sarles, Jeffrey W., McCombs, Hugh R.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
Judicial review of administrative acts, Labor arbitration

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Media madness: triggering statute of limitations? California courts examine whether news coverage should put someone on inquiry notice

Article Abstract:

Issues are discussed regarding the opposite conclusions of California appellate courts on whether extensive media coverage of a corporate problem could trigger the running of the statute of limitations. The cases are McKelvey v. Boeing North America, Inc and McGill v. M.J. Brock & Sons.

Author: Giller, Richard C.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 2000
California, Media coverage, Toxic torts, Limitation of actions, Statute of limitations

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: U.S. pension law reform under GATT: Retirement Protection Act trims benefits in Congressional effort to recover lost tariff revenues
  • Abstracts: Congress revises qualified plan distribution rules. IRS provides guidance on rollover distributions and 20% withholding under 1992 Unemployment Compensation Act
  • Abstracts: Using home equity for retirement income. Planning for retirement: defined benefit plans and planner due diligence
  • Abstracts: Court ducks larger privilege issues yet again. Waiver raised to the second power: waivers of evidentiary privileges by lawyers representing accused being tried in absentia
  • Abstracts: Although employers' restrictions on relationships between employees can give rise to claims, some restraints on office romances may withstand challenge
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.