Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Crackdown on sexism can backfire; firing an accused harasser can lead to a retaliatory suit

Article Abstract:

Employers who fire employees for alleged sexual harassment could end up liable for punitive damages if the terminated employee sues. A 1997 Wisconsin jury awarded Jerold Mackenzie $26.6 mil from his former employer, Miller Brewing Co. The safest approach for most companies is to conduct a complete and immediate investigation of harassment allegations, interview all witnesses including the alleged harasser, and guage whether or not the incident is part of an ongoing pattern.

Author: Spivak, Cary
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1997
United States, Analysis, Sexual harassment, Wisconsin

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Employees' lies can backfire; misconduct may bar employment suits

Article Abstract:

'After-acquired' evidence of employee misconduct can sometimes be used to bar an employment discrimination or wrongful termination lawsuit or at least to limit damages the employee can recover. Such misconduct may include lying on resumes or job applications. In order to augment the chances of using this defense, employers should always state on applications that misrepresentations and omissions will result in dismissal if discovered subsequent to employment.

Author: Maddux, David A., Barritt, Douglas A.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1993
Evaluation, Job applicants, Resumes (Employment), Resumes

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


California high court rules that employers can fire employees for misconduct based on good-faith belief resulting from investigation, without actual proof

Article Abstract:

The California Supreme Court ruled in Cotran v. Rollins Hudig Hall International, Inc., a case in which the employee was dismissed for sexual harassment denied by the employee, that an employer's reasonable, good-faith belief an employee engaged in misconduct can be reason enough for dismissing an employee. The employer must, however, adequately investigate the charges before dismissing the employee.

Author: Klein, Thomas P., Baxter, Ralph H., Jr.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1998
California, Good faith (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, Employee dismissals, Employment terminations, Employment at will
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Record state caseloads in 1990; but tort filings may be slowing because of reform legislation, report suggests
  • Abstracts: RTC runs into historic roadblock on seizure; preservationists use agency interest to force halt of property sale
  • Abstracts: No coattails; the Rodney King tape hasn't made it easier to sue for police brutality. Lawmaking by amateurs: initiatives drafted by kitchen-table legislators can have perverse results
  • Abstracts: Benefits practitioners take warning: contributions of unused vacation pay to employee benefit plans raise complex issues
  • Abstracts: Businessman: ABC's '20/20' has jaundiced eye; a Miami jury is hearing a libel case brought by a local real estate developer
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.