Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Crafting patents for the twenty-first century: maximize patent strength and avoid prosecution history estoppel in a post-Markman/Hilton Davis world

Article Abstract:

Patent prosecutors should revise their patent application and drafting strategies in light of two recent Supreme Court cases, Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc. and Hilton Davis Chemical Co. v. Warner-Jenkinson Co. Both cases reinforce the importance of the courts as claims interpreters. The Markman decision affirmed that judges are better able to interpret claims than are jurors. The Hilton Davis decision maintained the doctrine of equivalents, but the Court accepted that prosecution history estoppel can limit the doctrine's application.

Author: Mueller, Janice M.
Publisher: Patent and Trademark Office Society
Publication Name: Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0882-9098
Year: 1997
Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities, Patent Law, Cases, Law and fact, Equivalents doctrine (Patent law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The strategic use of means-plus-function claims

Article Abstract:

Means-plus-function claims are an important strategy in drafting patent claims because they increase the breadth of rights the patent owner possesses for the long and unpredictable patent claim process. The scope of means claims depends upon the specifications of each individual claim. The means claim is not necessarily of a narrower scope than literal language claims.

Author: Maier, Gregory J., Lytle, Bradley D.
Publisher: Patent and Trademark Office Society
Publication Name: Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0882-9098
Year: 1998
Methods, Legal composition

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The perils of patenting the industry standard

Article Abstract:

The author discusses patent law difficulties when equitable estoppel is raised in cases involving technology deemed an industry standard.

Author: Heinze, William F.
Publisher: Patent and Trademark Office Society
Publication Name: Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0882-9098
Year: 2001
United States

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Patent law, Patent practice, Estoppel, Management
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Stealing the good name of the company: the Fourth Circuit strengthens constitutional barriers for corporate defamation plaintiffs
  • Abstracts: Wireless companies turn to subleases; the structure offers advantages to carriers, such as protection against the bankruptcy of a cell tower
  • Abstracts: Emerging combatants, war crimes and the future of international humanitarian law. Examining international responses to illicit arms trafficking
  • Abstracts: Penal politics at the threshold of the twenty-first century
  • Abstracts: Reforming the new confirmation process: replacing "despise and resent" with "advise and consent". Burying Caesar: replacement of the veterans appeals process is needed to provide fairness to claimants
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.