Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Deadline for CFC warning labels nears

Article Abstract:

The EPA plans to release its final regulations implementing the Clean Air Amendments Act of 1990 in Feb 1993 and companies to whom the act's labeling requirements apply should examine their manufacturing fully and, if ozone-depleting substances (ODS) are used, consider alternative methods. If there is no alternative method, the company might be able to apply for a temporary exemption. There are also two exclusions from the labeling requirements, the 'incidental uses' exclusion and the one for substances which have been 'transformed' so as to no longer threaten the ozone layer.

Author: Jones, Stephen C.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1993
Hazardous substances, Ozone layer depletion

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Unless Congress authorizes the EPA to grant developers releases from liability, new inner-city cleanup programs may be of limited value

Article Abstract:

States have thus far led the way in encouraging the development of contaminated inner-city properties through so-called brownfields laws. While the US Environmental Protection Agency has issued a 'Brownfields Action Agenda,' Illinois, Indiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, and Ohio have created active programs. However, these have not yet addressed the fundamental problems: uncertainty over cleanup standards and requirements, and liability under federal law. The state plans, however, are still in development, and suggest alternatives.

Author: Jones, Stephen C.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
United States, Environmental aspects, Political aspects, Urban renewal, Inner cities, Toxic torts

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


EPA's recycling rules cause confusion

Article Abstract:

The Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) recycling rules, implementing the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), offer few and confusing exemptions for recyclers of hazardous wastes. In general, a hazardous waste must be a solid waste, so materials which do not qualify as solid wastes under RCRA need not follow the act's hazardous waste management standards. The solid waste definition needs to be rewritten to encourage more recycling.

Author: Jones, Stephen C.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1992
Recycling (Waste, etc.), Recycling, Hazardous wastes

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules, United States. Environmental Protection Agency
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Rethinking international trade. Domestic policy objectives and the multilateral trade order: lessons from the past
  • Abstracts: The myth of self-managing teams: a reflection on the allocation of responsibilities between individuals, teams and the organization
  • Abstracts: Guidelines for avoiding estate litigation. Effective drafting strategies for family limited partnerships. Choosing a formula clause based on funding effects
  • Abstracts: Securities law changes debated: supporters say bill restores fairness; critics claim it cuts investor protections
  • Abstracts: Study: Quayle was right ... and wrong; entitlement programs in Western Europe help accident victims avoid court
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.