Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Deportation must go on; aliens can't stop INS ouster with constitutional claim

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court upheld one of the court-stripping provisions of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 in the 1999 ruling of Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee. The ruling upheld one of the act's court-stripping provisions, stating that judges have no power to intervene to stop deportation, even when First Amendment rights are at issue. The ruling stated that illegal aliens have no constitutional right to claim selective enforcement as a defense against deportation.

Author: Savage, David G.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1999
Interpretation and construction, Emigration and immigration law, Immigration law

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Full benefits, no waiting; new life for the old privileges and immunities clause in welfare entitlement

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court used the privileges and immunities clause to invalidate a California law giving a two-tiered system of welfare benefits, and until Saenz, the California law had required a year of residence in the state to qualify for full welfare benefits. Former Governor Pete Wilson sponsored this law, boasting he hoped to end California's attraction as a "welfare magnet," and one provision of national welfare reform specifically authorized states to pay lower benefits to newcomers.

Author: Savage, David G.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1999
States, Cases, Welfare recipients, Privileges and immunities, Domicile in public welfare, Public welfare domicile

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The great alien lockout; can Congress bar courts from hearing deportation challenges?

Article Abstract:

The Supreme Court will consider the legality of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 in Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee. The law tries to shut off lengthy deportation appeals by illegal aliens, and the jurisdictional limitations raise one of the greatest unanswered constitutional law issues. That laws can restrict and regulate jurisdiction is generally accepted, but not that they can refuse access to the courts entirely.

Author: Savage, David G.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1998

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Illegal immigrants, Deportation
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Title III of the Helms-Burton Act is consistent with international law. Agora: the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (Libertad) Act
  • Abstracts: Extradition statute - constitutional law - separation of powers - appointments clause
  • Abstracts: Democracy and dispute resolution: individual rights in international trade organizations
  • Abstracts: Commercial law; electronic transactions. Commercial law; collateral disposition
  • Abstracts: Federal practice - computer evidence. Federal practice; ethical issues. Federal practice; securities pleadings
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.