Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Director liability under the federal securities laws

Article Abstract:

Securities law liability of corporate directors can be based on several theories and on a number of different activities. Directors can be liable as directors, as controlling persons and as aiders and abettors, as well as based on causing a misstatement. Forms of corporate communication, such as corporate reports, registration statements, press releases and financial statements are bases for liability, as is securities trading. Lawyer-directors and inside directors may be subject to additional duties of investigation regarding corporate information.

Author: Cheek, James H., III, Brown, Meredith M.
Publisher: Africa-America-Institute
Publication Name: Annual Institute on Securities Regulation
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0195-5756
Year: 1995
United States, Corporate directors

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Shaping the governance of executive compensation

Article Abstract:

Executive compensation has become the primary controversy of corporate governance in the 1990s, and companies may benefit from review of their procedures. Public pressure has led to legislative attempts to control compensation which will probably not pass in 1992, but the SEC is also taking regulatory action which emphasizes but is not limited to disclosure. Efforts in the corporation could focus on membership in the board of directors, the compensation committee and its deliberations.

Author: Cheek, James H., III
Publisher: Africa-America-Institute
Publication Name: Annual Institute on Securities Regulation
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0195-5756
Year: 1992
Disclosure (Taxation)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Executive compensation and corporate governance; an academic perspective

Article Abstract:

Executive compensation should not be controlled by the courts or Congress, but should remain as a power of corporate directors. Corporate governance has legal, market and contract aspects, and compensation is a feature of internal monitoring for governance. In fact, compensation is the most direct form of control that directors can have over executives, even if an optimal system of deciding compensation has not been developed.

Author: Gilson, Ronald J.
Publisher: Africa-America-Institute
Publication Name: Annual Institute on Securities Regulation
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0195-5756
Year: 1992

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Interpretation and construction, Laws, regulations and rules, Securities law, Analysis, Compensation and benefits, Corporate governance, Executives, Executive compensation
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Jurisdiction under federal securities laws to recover ill-gotten gains from third parties. A blue sky state of mind: the meaning of "willfully" in blue sky criminal cases
  • Abstracts: Recent changes in the tax laws affecting multinational corporations in certain trading partners of the United States
  • Abstracts: 'Do it on the cheap' justice must go. Might affirmative action balance U.S. justice? Ax poised over habeas
  • Abstracts: Inmate says U.S. stole secret and he wants compensation. The legal secret of Viacom deal; lawyers finessed Del. governance rules to make merger work
  • Abstracts: Overview of securities litigation reform. Underwriters' counsel in the current capital markets environment. Due diligence procedures of issuers' representatives in the modern underwriting environment
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.