Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Directors under fire; corporate board members should approach their tasks with caution

Article Abstract:

Business litigation is more frequent and corporate directors are growing more apprehensive about their liability. Directors should be aware that the business judgment rule still provides them appreciable protection. They must, however, be sure they are apprised of all the facts when taking part in board decisions. They should steer clear of situations where they or close relatives have conflicts of interest with corporate activities. They should not accept directorships unless they have investigated the companies whose boards they may join and can take an active part in the board's work.

Author: Sommer, A.A., Jr.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1992
Business judgment rule, Indemnity against liability, Liability indemnity

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


A watchdog for the guardians

Article Abstract:

The American Law Institute's Corporate Governance Project has proposed a change in the rules on shareholder litigation requiring corporate boards to show evidence in court that the dismissal of a shareholder claim charging self-dealing was in the company's best interest. The rule mandating a formal 'demand' on the board by stockholders would apply across the board rather than being subject to excuse. Demand on the board is inexpensive and easy and requiring it across the board will increase the chances of a dispute resolution before involvement by the courts.

Author: Coffee, John C., Jr.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1992
Stockholders' derivative actions, Shareholder lawsuits

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


No: the SEC is our best line of defense against crooks

Article Abstract:

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is necessary to regulate the securities industry and markets, to investigate fraud, and to prevent the problems that recently beset the savings and loan industry. State regulators, the exchanges, private litigants, and market forces are all inadequate to replace the SEC functions. Its most vital purpose is the disclosure system, which makes the US markets and methods the model for every other exchange in the world.

Author: Sommer, A.A., Jr.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1995
United States, Management, Financial services industry, Financial services, United States. Securities and Exchange Commission

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules, Corporate directors
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Proxy reform, takeovers, and corporate control: the need for a new orientation. Facilitating shareholder communications
  • Abstracts: Using statistics to measure insurer financial strength. A rational approach to life insurer ratings. The quandary of the life insurance agent in a time of uncertainty
  • Abstracts: California underground regulations. Administrative law in the 21st century. 'A Civil Action' holds up a mirror to David vs. Goliath litigation
  • Abstracts: Current issues in prepackaged Chapter 11 plans of reorganization and using the Federal Declaratory Judgment Act for instant reorganizations
  • Abstracts: The "new value exception" in single-asset reorganizations: a commentary on the Bjolmes auction procedure and its relationship to Chapter 11
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.