Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

EEOC is sending the wrong message

Article Abstract:

EEOC guidance on what employers must do to reasonably accommodate mentally ill employees under the Americans with Disabilities Act may actually do a disservice to the mentally ill by, in the long run, creating a backlash against them. Employees who cannot function in a normal work environment have no business being there. What society should do is to take on the cost of support payments and mental health treatments, not mandate that employers act as if no problem exists. Specially structured work programs for mentally ill people whose problems would be worsened by isolation and dependence could be developed.

Author: Reiter, Jendi B.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1997
Mentally ill persons, Employment, Mentally ill

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Retaliation lawsuits are increasing rapidly; in the wake of new EEOC guidelines and Supreme Court precedent, employers should hone anti-retaliation policies

Article Abstract:

Every US employer must intensify anti-retaliation measures and fine-tune its anti-harassment programs to accord with the US Supreme Court's landmark decisions establishing employers' strict liability for sexual harassment and the EEOC's May 1998 guidelines on retaliation. Strict liability as the presumptive standard for supervisorial harassment makes liability for retaliatory conduct in violation of Title VII inevitable. The employer's preventive measures will minimize the risk of retaliation and of the subsequent liability of the company.

Author: Butler, Teresa L., Weber, A. Michael
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1999
United States

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


ADA guidance issued for interviews: new EEOC guidelines should help employers develop permissible questions for job applicants

Article Abstract:

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission on Oct 10 released guidelines to help employers comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act in pre-employment interviews and medical examinations. These replace the guidelines issued in May 1994, will be used by EEOC inspectors, and may be used by the courts. Employers may not ask disability-related questions before making an offer, and cannot try to determine the nature or severity of a disability, though temporary impairments may be investigated.

Author: Lynch, Michael C., Baillie, Karen E.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
Employment interviewing, Discrimination against disabled persons, Handicapped discrimination

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Prevention, Employment discrimination, United States. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Job interview can bring ADA liability: revised EEOC guidelines help employers avoid improper disability questions
  • Abstracts: Law firm web sites: going beyond the brochure: areas for other professionals and full or partial interactivity could draw larger audiences
  • Abstracts: There is a developing trend among courts of making choice of forum clauses in franchise agreements presumptively invalid
  • Abstracts: An ounce of prevention. The Federal Reserve and investment policies for insurers
  • Abstracts: Refugee law still needs fix. It's cosy in the castle with the drawbridge up. Anti-immigrant bill flouts U.N. agreement
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.