Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

EPA has authority to regulate biotechnology under several statutes; it relies on acts aimed at toxic substances and pesticides, along with environmental laws

Article Abstract:

The biotechnology industry shows great promise and the EPA feels the pressure to allow this industry to develop without overburdening it with regulation in the process. The agency's authority to regulate biotechnology comes from many laws including the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act and the Toxic Substances Control Act. The agency's policy for regulating the industry was released in 1992 and attempted to balance the interests of protecting environmental safety and encouraging the new industry vy adopting a 'risk-based approach.'

Author: Muys, Jerome C., Jr.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
Biochemistry, Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences, Biotechnology industry, Biotechnology industries, Environmental aspects

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Overhaul of Clean Air Act rules dismays industry; the EPA's proposed new source review rules would limit many plants to past emission levels

Article Abstract:

The EPA's proposed overhaul of its New Source Review (NSR) rules under the Clean Air Act does not go far enough. The issue is whether an existing plant may operate at full capacity while undergoing changes or should be limited to a lower emission level fixed by historic experience until the NSR is complete. The proposed regulations are needlessly complex. Exclusions from the restrictions which the NSR proposal allows for are discussed.

Author: Connery, Robert T.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Rule requires adoption of risk plans; facilities must analyze their worst-case release scenarios and submit public EPA plans

Article Abstract:

The EPA's Risk Management Program Rule fulfills the agency's obligations under Section 112(r) of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments to implement regulations preventing accidental releases of regulated substances and reduce the severity of those releases which do happen. Among the affected facilities are chemical producers, industrial manufacturers and petroleum refineries.

Author: Lawrence, Deborah A., Staehler, Charles J.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1998

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, United States. Environmental Protection Agency, Toxic torts, Industrial wastes
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Confidentiality agreements become increasingly elusive; several states have limited the availability of protective orders, and judges are now more skeptical about issuing such orders
  • Abstracts: EU recycle laws could spark trade war. EU to manufacturers: take back old products; there are plans to extend take-back measures from packaging to vehicles and electronics
  • Abstracts: Mixed responses to new safety consultation rights. HSC proposes costly and far-reaching changes to use of work equipment laws
  • Abstracts: Derivatives: market and regulatory dynamics. Betting the bank: how derivatives trading under conditions of uncertainty can increase risks and erode returns in financial markets
  • Abstracts: Making criminals pay: New Jersey a leader in collecting fines and restitution. Collecting fines ... and criticism; federal judges get out of collections oversight after report blasts effort
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.