Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

ERISA preemption and the states: a new look at the issue

Article Abstract:

Some states are requesting exemptions from Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) preemption to enabled them to enact health care reforms, but allowing states to establish separate taxing and financing schemes would be contrary to the intent of ERISA. ERISA was enacted to provide national standards for employee benefit plans and to provide employers with the certainty and efficiency of meeting a single set of standards. State taxation, state pooling of plans and state rate setting will not provide solutions to health care financing problems.

Author: Atkins, G. Lawrence
Publisher: Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
Publication Name: Tax Management Compensation Planning Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-8607
Year: 1995
Analysis, Qualified benefit plans, Health care reform

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Conflict preemption versus complete preemption in ERISA cases

Article Abstract:

US Supreme Court case law has established the distinction between conflict preemption under section 514(a) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and complete preemption under ERISA section 502(a). If conflict preemption is present, the claim stays in state court and the preemption claim can be offered as a defense. Complete preemption is an exception to the well-pleaded complaint rule, and the suit must be removed to federal court for the court to determine whether a federal question is, in fact, present under ERISA.

Author: Hawksley, Alan J., Cox, Julie D.
Publisher: Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
Publication Name: Tax Management Compensation Planning Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-8607
Year: 1996
United States, Cases, Employee benefits, Removal of causes, states

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


ERISA preemption: gain tax case sets a new precedent and raises new issues

Article Abstract:

Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. v. Tax Appeals Tribunal, a New York Court of Appeals case, marked the first time a court considered whether ERISA preempted a general state tax on pension plan earnings. The court found in favor of the ERISA preemption, which means New York and other financially hard-pressed states cannot levy income taxes on funds in ERISA plans. The case may even mean that states can no longer impose unrelated business income taxes and others that are levied on tax exempt organizations such as ERISA plans.

Author: Corry, John A.
Publisher: Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
Publication Name: Tax Management Compensation Planning Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-8607
Year: 1992
Taxation, Pension funds, State taxation

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules, Exclusive and concurrent legislative powers, Preemption (Legislative power)
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Interpretation of the CGL policy in the long-tail product hazard cases - price/availability implications. State-of-the-art evidence in long-tail product liability litigation: the transformation of the tort system into a compensation systems
  • Abstracts: Public opinion and the development of the European security and defense policy. The Political and Security Committee: governing in the shadow
  • Abstracts: Fiscal state aid goes global. Multinationals, enforcement covenants and fair share. Conference Report: The EU and Third Countries: Direct Taxation, 13-14 October 2006, Vienna
  • Abstracts: Out of the extraordinary: Supreme Court creates key precedents even on 'routine' business issues. Race matters: new cases return a volatile issue to the top of the Supreme Court's agenda
  • Abstracts: Hiring without a net; firms need to check coverage on new attorneys with old lawsuits. Playing to the bench
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.