Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Editorial

Article Abstract:

Business law developments in Australia in March 1997 included a case on auditing liability, reforms for small businesses and changes in the focus of the Corporate Law Simplification Program. In Esanda Finance Corp. v. Peat Marwick Hungerfords, the High Court found that auditors were not liable for a third party's reliance on their reports. Corporate law reforms will focus on economic objectives, according to Treasurer Peter Costello. Reducing bureaucracy for small businesses and accounting reforms have also been proposed.

Publisher: LBC Information Services
Publication Name: Australian Business Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0310-1053
Year: 1997
Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities, Small Business, Business Law NEC, Economic aspects, Cases, Commercial law, Corporation law, Auditors

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Editorial

Article Abstract:

The Wallis Committee Report into the Australian Financial System, titled "Financial System Enquiry - Final Report," offers a number of reforms that would improve financial systems and regulations. The report calls for further deregulation, a limit on mergers among the four major banks, and reduced duplication of regulatory activity. The report also includes a number of more technical recommendations and a call for greater regulator accountability.

Publisher: LBC Information Services
Publication Name: Australian Business Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0310-1053
Year: 1996
Regulation, Licensing, and Inspection of Miscellaneous Commercial Sectors, Banking Regulation, Financial services industry, Financial services, Securities law

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The "Liggett Doctrine": mistaken payments in the banker-customer relationship

Article Abstract:

The Liggett Doctrine is inadequate for some situations in which a bank seeks to recover payments from a customer in equity, but two recent decisions will improve its application by use of the principle of unjust enrichment. The Australian decision is ANZ Banking Group v. Westpac Banking Corp and the New Zealand decision is Westpac v. Rae.

Author: De Silva, Palitha
Publisher: LBC Information Services
Publication Name: Australian Business Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0310-1053
Year: 1993

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Editorial, Australia, Laws, regulations and rules, Interpretation and construction, Banking law
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The Civil Rights Act of 1991 and less discriminatory alternatives in disparate impact litigation. The Civil Rights Act of 1991: the business necessity standard
  • Abstracts: The role of the corporate attorney within the takeover context: loyalties to whom? SEC enforcement actions against securities lawyers: new remedies vs. old policies
  • Abstracts: Deducting interest on federal income tax underpayments: a roadmap through a 50-year quagmire. Losing face but gaining power: state taxation of interstate commerce
  • Abstracts: The institutional and normative significance of the European Union's Acquired Rights Directive. All aboard the Congressional fast track: from trade to beyond
  • Abstracts: The labor side agreement under the NAFTA: analysis of its failure to include strong enforcement provisions and recommendations for future labor agreements negotiated with developing countries
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.