Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Equal protection

Article Abstract:

Three leading equal protection cases were decided in the US Supreme Court's 1991 term. United States v Fordice treats state-supported predominantly black universities as constitutionally suspect, a decision which could restrict black students' choices to attend institutions where their race is the majority. In Georgia v McCollum, the court ruled that criminal defendants may not racially discriminate in the use of peremptory challenges. In Freeman v Pitts, the court allowed a district court to discontinue supervision of a racially segregated school district before integration was achieved.

Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1992
Equality before the law, Equal protection, Race discrimination, School integration

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Eighth Amendment

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court in Hudson v McMillian helped to clarify the standards governing treatment of prisoners qualifying as cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment. The court properly held that severity of punishment rather than severity of injury determines whether force is excessive. However, the court also extended the 'malicious and sadistic' subjective standard to all excessive force cases, exposing prisoners to abuse by prison officials who indiscriminately use force.

Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1992
Punishment, Prison discipline

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA



Subjects list: Cases, Surveys, United States. Supreme Court
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The once and future property-based vision of the First Amendment
  • Abstracts: Continuing legal education. CLE directory
  • Abstracts: Estoppel by convention - an old doctrine with new potential. Priority rights in insolvency - the doctrinal basis for equity's intervention
  • Abstracts: Adjudication as representation. Suing the president: nonstatutory review revisited. The scope of representation-reinforcing judicial review
  • Abstracts: What the new civil rights law will mean to organizations. Labor pains: the rights of the pregnant employee
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.