Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Evidence - evidentiary privilege - First Circuit recognizes crime-fraud exception to psychotherapist-patient privilege. - In re Grand Jury Proceedings (Gregory P. Violette)

Article Abstract:

The author discusses the U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals 1999 case In re Grand Jury Proceedings (Gregory P. Violette) where the court applied the crime-fraud exception to the psychotherapist-patient evidentiary privilege. The author believes that the court's reasoning which was based upon analogy to the lawyer-client privilege was appropriate on the facts of the case, but would not justify the application of the exception to all cases.

Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 2000
Testimony, Confidential communications, Psychotherapists, Grand jury, Grand juries, Mental health counseling

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Criminal law - Fifth Amendment - Fourth Circuit holds that 18 U.S.C. s. 3501, not Miranda v. Arizona, governs the admissibility of confessions in federal courts - United States v. Dickerson

Article Abstract:

The author discusses a U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals case holding that 18 U.S.C. 3501 controls admissibility of confessions in federal courts. The author believes that the court incorrectly disregarded the constitutional underpinnings and practical legitimacy of Miranda v. Arizona.

Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 2000
Federal courts, Confession (Law), Confessions (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Navigating uncertainty: gatekeeping in the absence of hard science

Article Abstract:

The author discusses the problems facing trial judges in their mandated role as gatekeepers concerning admission of scientific expert evidence, and suggests an analytical framework for analysis of such evidence.

Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 2000
Analysis, Evidence, Expert, Expert evidence, Judicial process, Evidence, Scientific, Scientific evidence (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Evidence (Law)
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: A splintered privilege; two judges have taken exception to tobacco's confidentiality claims. Fear at an Oct. meeting spurs Liggett settlement; parties step up talks after news of congressional plan
  • Abstracts: Supreme Court resolves major age discrimination controversy: ratification and tender back impermissible under OWBPA
  • Abstracts: Rising attraction of inflation-indexed securities. Short-term Treasury securities outshine money market funds
  • Abstracts: Nonformalistic law in time and space. Interpretation, empiricism, and the closure problem. Form and substance in law and morality
  • Abstracts: The cycles of statutory interpretation. Norms, empiricism, and canons in statutory interpretation
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.