Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Extradition reopened; Justice denies it withheld evidence about Ivan the Terrible

Article Abstract:

The 6th US Circuit Court of Appeals on Jun 5, 1992, reopened the extradition case of John Demjanjuk, who was extradited to Israel under suspicion of being a Nazi concentration camp guard and whose death sentence for killing Jews while so employed is currently being appealed in Israel. The US appeal occurred on the court's own initiative and concerns evidence not part of the record from sources such as news accounts that John Demjanjuk is not the concentration camp guard 'Ivan the Terrible.' Reopening a case on the court's own motion and based on evidence not part of the record are both without precedent.

Author: Hansen, Mark
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1992
History, War crimes, Treblinka (Concentration camp), Demjanjuk, John

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Final justice; limiting death row appeals

Article Abstract:

The Supreme Court is moving toward more support for the death penalty and limitations on habeas corpus appeals. Capital punishment opponents accuse the court of legislating from the bench what Congress and the President so far have not done. The Court issued three important capital punishment decisions in 1991: McCleskley v Zant, Coleman v Thompson, and Payne v Tennessee. In these 6-3 rulings the Court required that all grounds for habeas corpus be included in the first appeal, that the first appeal be filed on time, and that victim-impact and character evidence be allowed in capital punishment trials.

Author: Hansen, Mark
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1992
Analysis, Capital punishment, Habeas corpus

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Minor adjustments; judge, as a last resort, may jail a girl who ignores an order to visit her father, appeals court says

Article Abstract:

The Illinois case of Marshall v. Nussbaum concerns a judge jailing a 12-year-old and grounding her 8-year-old sister because they refused to comply with a visitation order with their father. The children and their mother argue that the court has no right to interfere in parent-child discipline and hope to convince the Illinois Supreme Court of this fact. Howard Davidson, director of the ABA Center on Children and the Law, states the case could have been avoided had ABA policy of providing children who are the center of child custody disputes with their own counsel been followed.

Author: Hansen, Mark
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1996
Visitation rights (Domestic relations), Illinois, Parent and child (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Dead hand pills being dropped; companies not willing to risk challenge after rulings. Bankruptcy claims head to mediation; Del. judge approves use to settle personal injury cases
  • Abstracts: Administration of a business interest held by an estate or trust. Conservation easements help preserve real estate for an owner's family
  • Abstracts: Enough, already? Defense attorneys complain about multiple retrials. The revolving door; hiring big political guns can sometimes be a risky proposition
  • Abstracts: Tampering with evidence; the liability and competitiveness myth. Navigating the shoals; Whitewater counsel denies conflicts, admits job a liability
  • Abstracts: Antitrust shift eyed with doubt. Judge is nearing decision on bailout for Mutual Benefit
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.