Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

FDA can nix marks pre-PTO

Article Abstract:

The pharmacutical industry knows how important it is to select and clear their trademarks early in the product development cycle, what many of these firms do not know is that the FDA can object to a mark while the product is before the FDA for approval. Such objections can arise independently of US Patent and Trademark Office objections, even if the mark is already federally registered. The FDA's Labelling and Nomenclature Committee was set up to facilitate review of trademarks and labelling of products. The FDA criteria differ from the 'likelihood of confusion' criteria used by the PTO.

Author: Bengtsson, W. Patrick, McPaul, Georgina
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1998

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Should the exemption from the Robinson-Patman Act apply to pharmaceutical purchases by nonprofit HMOs?

Article Abstract:

The US Northern District Court of Illinois decision in In re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litigation continued an inappropriate interpretive expansion of section 13c of the Robinson-Patman Act and indicated the need for a new interpretive theory. In order to avoid further undesired outcomes, courts should apply a changed circumstances interpretive theory to obsolete statutes such as 13c. This textualist and originalist theory would restrict courts from expansive interpretations of section 13 and thus signal to Congress their need to update the statute.

Author: Pollack, Aimee M.W.
Publisher: New York University Law Review
Publication Name: New York University Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0028-7881
Year: 1998
Interpretation and construction, Antitrust law, Health maintenance organizations

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The FDA: is it protecting the public with one hand tied behind its back?

Article Abstract:

There have been proposals to enhance the enforcement powers of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in response to crises such as the one involving silicone breast implants. Proposals include granting the FDA subpoena power, product recall powers, and the authority to levy civil monetary penalties. These proposals represent a balance between protecting the public health and the economic health of the drug industry.

Author: Shedlin, Roger S.
Publisher: American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics
Publication Name: Law, Medicine & Health Care
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0277-8459
Year: 1992
Powers and duties

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Pharmaceutical industry, United States. Food and Drug Administration
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: FDA reform and the European Medicines Evaluation Agency. Reform of the new drug approval process. Some FDA applications can escape full testing; draft guidance suggests that in many cases, studies conducted by others will be acceptable
  • Abstracts: The last priesthood: the coming revolution in medical care delivery. A better way to spur medical research and development
  • Abstracts: Financial planning regulation and the life insurance agent. The importance of properly funding universal life
  • Abstracts: Fusion and the associational rights of minor political parties. Treaty-based rights and remedies of individuals
  • Abstracts: The standard of review for the voluntariness of a confession on direct appeal in federal court. Taming a phoenix: the year-and-a-day rule in federal prosecutions for murder
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.