Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Fewer law school applicants; more minorities seek admission, but not enough to offset drop in white males

Article Abstract:

Law school applications for white males are declining, while those for minorities are rising. The Law School Admission Services' statistics for the 1992-93 school year show that applications from whites dropped 5.7%, with males accounting for the decline since female applicants rose 1.3%. The number of applicants from all other racial and ethnic groups increased. Asians, Pacific Islanders, and Hispanic Americans accounted for the increase in minority applications. Law school enrollment followed the same pattern.

Author: Reske, Henry J.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1992
Statistics, Minority law students

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Law school affirmative action in doubt; 5th Circxuit ruling strikes down University of Texas admissions preferences

Article Abstract:

The US Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit ruled in Hopwood v. Texas that admissions preferences for African- and Hispanic-Americans violated both the 14th Amendment and Supreme Court precedent. The court ruled that basing admission on race could remedy only past discrimination at the law school. The ruling reversed a district court decision permitting race-based admission and followed a number of legal assaults on affirmative action.

Author: Reske, Henry J.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1996
Cases, Affirmative action, College admissions, Law school admissions

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The expanding law of privilege; psychotherapy sessions ruled strictly confidential

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court ruled in Jaffee v. Redmond that psychotherapy sessions are confidential, applying the priviklege to psychiatrists, psychologists and clinical social workers. All 50 states and the District of Columbia have this privilege in some form and according to the Supreme Court it is based on the need for successful treatment. The court has yet to define the standard to be used to judge new areas of privilege.

Author: Reske, Henry J.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1996
Confidential communications, Therapist-patient relations, Mental health counseling, Privileges and immunities, Psychotherapist and patient

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Law schools, United States
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Legal-thriller author gives tips to wannabes; outline, rewrite and keep your butt in the desk chair. Grisham wannabes; getting your thriller published is a long shot - but possible
  • Abstracts: New product liability bills; congressional effort to supplant state laws resumes. Hard time; mandatory minimum sentencing comes under congressional scrutiny
  • Abstracts: 'BMW' triggers cuts in punies; states are lenient, but federal courts interpret landmark ruling harshly. Maryland's highest court makes revolutionary changes in punies
  • Abstracts: Federal Circuit clarifies laches defense. Questions persist on security interests
  • Abstracts: The determinants of incumbent union victory in raid elections. Decertification elections: an analysis of recent activity
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.