Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Finding the right script: trial lawyers must fit their cases to the belief patterns of juries

Article Abstract:

Lawyers seeking credibility and persuasive force with a jury must consider how juries test the validity of an idea. Many people have a variety of often conflicting perceptions of, for example, the police, based on various formative experiences. A strong presentation selects the appropriate perception and reinforces it. Further, the presenting attorney should try to explain why someone did something, especially when that action may not fit many peoples' expectations. Motive is a critical to building credibility.

Author: McElhaney, James W.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1995
Analysis, Beliefs, opinions and attitudes, Jury members, Motive (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Putting the case together: a disorganized approach can make a mess out of litigation

Article Abstract:

Trial lawyers in complex cases should be especially sure to present their cases in an organized manner. They should arrange the evidence into a story, picking the best evidence to make each important point. They should plan the story to take advantage of their strong points and deal with their weak ones. They should tell the story in an interesting way, resisting the temptation to use too much legalese.

Author: McElhaney, James W.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1995

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Highlighting; putting the right emphasis on the proof in the case

Article Abstract:

Trial lawyers should be careful to maintain a rhythm during trial in order to hold the interest of judge and jurors. Techniques which can help achieve this include effective use of the best witnesses, reverse leading, refreshing a witness' memory according to Federal Rule of Evidence 611(c), and combining a witness impeachment with a prior inconsistent statement.

Author: McElhaney, James W.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1993

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Methods, United States, Lawyers, Trial practice
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Let your fingers do the talking; electronic mail can help lawyers stay in touch with clients. Six mistakes lawyers make; misadventures in technoland that needn't happen
  • Abstracts: Defining the producer/client relationship. Professional ethics and corporate business practices. Strictly speaking
  • Abstracts: Changing the rules. New opportunities; two ABA leaders rise to key positions at EEOC. Grassroots lessons
  • Abstracts: A perspective on the Electromation case from the U.S. Department of Labor. Electromation and the future of labor-management cooperation in the U.S
  • Abstracts: Parent trap; corporate mergers and acquisitions can create conflict of interest. It ain't over until ... there's a right way and a wrong way to end client relationships
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.