Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Form 1040 filed after deficiency assessment not a tax return

Article Abstract:

The Sixth Circuit has issued a ruling in a case involving a Form 1040 that was submitted after the IRS filed a deficiency assessment and prepared substitute returns. In 'Hindenlang,' the court ruled that the substitute returns prepared by the IRS under Section 6020(b) were valid and averred that the taxpayer could not use a bankruptcy filing to avert payment of his tax deficiency. The circuit court examined the four-part test used by the IRS in determining if a filing could be considered a tax return and cited the test in its decision upholding the legality of the IRS action.

Author: Gribens, Bruce K., Dougherty, James A., Blattner, David G.
Publisher: Warren, Gorham & Lamont, Inc.
Publication Name: Practical Tax Strategies
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0040-0165
Year: 1999
Interpretation and construction, Bankruptcy law

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Individual cannot sue charity for nondisclosure

Article Abstract:

A New York district court has ruled that individual taxpayers cannot sue tax-exempt organizations for nondisclosure of their Form 1990. In 'Schuloff v. Queens College Foundation,' the court ruled that four factors had to be considered before it could be determined if there was a private cause of action under Section 6104. After reviewing the circumstances of the case, the district court ruled against the taxpayer, noting that no state law had been breached.

Author: Gribens, Bruce K., Dougherty, James A., Blattner, David G.
Publisher: Warren, Gorham & Lamont, Inc.
Publication Name: Practical Tax Strategies
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0040-0165
Year: 1999
New York, Charities, Nonprofit organizations, District courts

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Extension remittances deemed tax payments

Article Abstract:

The Second Circuit has issued a ruling in a case involving remittances submitted with extension-to-file requests. In 'Ertman,' the court ruled that such remittances can be deemed to be tax payments rather than deposits. Citing Section 6511's provisions on refund claims, the court ruled in favor of the taxpayers after considering three factors: the timing of remittances, the taxpayers' intent and the treatment of the remittances by the IRS.

Author: Gribens, Bruce K., Dougherty, James A., Blattner, David G.
Publisher: Warren, Gorham & Lamont, Inc.
Publication Name: Practical Tax Strategies
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0040-0165
Year: 1999
Tax refunds

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules, United States. Internal Revenue Service, Tax returns, Circuit courts
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Year 2000 issue may be glitch, not a crisis, thanks to attorneys. Laws on e-sigs inked; competing technologies test states' definitions of an electronic signature
  • Abstracts: Finding a pinch hitter; in case of emergency, don't leave work without designating a backup. Kissing law books goodbye; many small firms are retooling their libraries via new technologies
  • Abstracts: Courts split on individuals' deficiency interest deduction. Tax court rejects stock aggregation; accepts minority discount
  • Abstracts: Intratextualism. Foreword: the document and the doctrine. Hercules, Herbert, and Amar: the trouble with intratextualism
  • Abstracts: A report on the development of the proposed Unidroit Convention on International Interests in Mobile Equipment as applied to aircraft equipment
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.