Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

GM verdict could affect future cases

Article Abstract:

The verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the Georgia case of Moseley v General Motors Corp foreshadows major products liability issues for the 1990s. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is investigating the safety of the GM trucks involved in the litigation. If the NHTSA decides that the truck is defective even though it complied with federal safety standards when designed, this would reverse key tenets of products liability law. The constitutionality and size of punitive damages awarded in civil lawsuits is another Moseley issue likely to reemerge.

Author: LaManna, Sam
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1993
Investigations, Exemplary damages, Punitive damages, United States. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Excessive tort litigation costs vaporize profits

Article Abstract:

Products liability law is one area of the civil justice system which badly needs reform. Senator Robert W. Kasten's tort reform bill (S640) would have imposed uniform product liability standards including narrowed liability for product sellers, caps on punitive damages, and encouragement for alternative dispute resolution. The bill did not pass the Senate. Our civil rights can be made safest by limiting the scope of national government and letting the states take care of safeguarding our personal and property rights.

Author: Bush, George W.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1992
National government, Justice, Administration of, Administration of justice, Federal government

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


In the new Restatement on Torts, the reporters distinguished manufacturing defects from design and warning defects

Article Abstract:

The Restatement (3d) on Torts defines three basic product defect types and distinguishes them from defects related to design or providing warnings. The manufacturing defect test and reasonableness standard established by the Third Restatement represent a major step forward in legal theory. The standard used in the Restatement (3d) is not based solely on consumer expectations of product design, but it does incorporate theories of consumer risk and foreseeability.

Author: Birnbaum, Sheila L., Jackson, J. Russell
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1997
United States, Torts

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules, Product liability, Products liability
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Making a virtual house call; states revisit the issue of telemedicine as it expands to cover diagnosis and treatment
  • Abstracts: Protection of business investments in human capital: shop right and related doctrines. A critical review of the Czech employee invention statute
  • Abstracts: Storm over Niagara: a catalyst in reshaping government in the United States and Canada during the Progressive Era
  • Abstracts: Excerpts: Tenn. court rules in embryo case. She never would have entered into the agreement if she had been advised by a competent attorney
  • Abstracts: Liability for injuries caused by the printed media. Looking at Europe for the difference between strict and fault-based liability
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.