Don't 'sunset' the FTC order against Harley's exclusive dealing recidivism, dominance, and forced inefficiency

Article Abstract:

Harley-Davidson's request that the 1954 Federal Trade Commission consent order be lifted is an attempt to enforce exclusive dealing contracts on dealers that may force many double-line and triple-line dealers out of business. To restrict the way dealers structure their businesses is anti-competitive. Lifting the order may also affect Harley-Davidson dealers' ability to serve their customers. Harley-Davidson is notoriously slow in filling parts orders, and competing parts manufacturers are essential to providing customers with timely repairs.

---

Don't 'sunset' the FTC order against Harley's exclusive dealing: recidivism, dominance, and forced inefficiency

Article Abstract:

Harley-Davidson motorcycle dealers request that the Federal Trade Commission not grant Harley-Davidson's request for an end to the order barring it from using exclusive dealing arrangements. Despite signs from Harley-Davidson that it would retaliate against any protesting dealers, roughly 100 of the 600 franchisees have objected, with few seeking confidentiality. The complaints allege continuing problems with Harley-Davidson and predict harm or destruction for their businesses if Harley-Davidson's request is granted.

Motorcycle, Bicycle, and Parts Manufacturing, Motorcycles, bicycles, and parts, Motorcycle Parts

---

Similar abstracts:

• Abstracts: Harley-Davidson petition to lift 1954 order: exclusive dealing is 'procompetitive.' Anatomy of a monopoly: the Harley-Davidson model

This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.