Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

High court to resolve class action fight; if class can't be certified for suit, can it be for settlement?

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court will decide in Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor, whether federal courts can, under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, certify class actions just for settlement, even though the claim could not be litigated as a class. The case will help decide whether federal courts can manage the long and costly claims resulting from some mass torts. Federal and state courts have more than 300,000 pending, and more than 50,000 new cases were filed in 1995. There is much scholarly difference of opinion about whether certification just for settlement purposes is possible.

Author: Coyle, Marcia
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1997
United States, Management, Class actions (Civil procedure), Cases, Class action lawsuits, Multidistrict litigation, Asbestos

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Indigent defense system KO'd: unconstitutional in La

Article Abstract:

New Orleans, LA, judge Calvin Johnson recently held Louisiana's system of indigent defense unconstitutional and ordered the state Legislature to devise a new one. Johnson claims the system violates the state Constitution's requirement that it be uniform. Inadequate funding, according to Johnson, hinders proper defense efforts on behalf of indigent clients. Johnson's ruling is the result of a petition by public defender Rick Teissier, who complained that the public defender's office is denied adequate funding.

Author: Coyle, Marcia
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1992
Economic aspects, Laws, regulations and rules, Legal assistance to the poor, Right to counsel

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


New light on an old defense of 'secrets;' writ attacks a 1953 high court ruling

Article Abstract:

The continued struggle of survivors of a civilian killed in the crash of an Air Force plane in 1948 is discussed. They attack as spurious the government's protecting as a national security secret the information regarding this crash. The parallels of this case to that of Yasser Hamdi is also summarized, an alleged terrorist fighting his enemy combatant designation.

Author: Coyle, Marcia
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 2003
Accidents, Protection and preservation, Defense information, Classified, Classified defense information, Airplanes, Military, Military airplanes

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA

Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Mass tort makeover? (impact of lessons learned from class action lawsuits over silicone breast implants on chances for tort reform)
  • Abstracts: Dispute resolution and counsel: changing perceptions, changing responsibilities. Contract disputes: the role of ADR
  • Abstracts: Police protection; some courts say officers can assert immunity for shootings that are an excessive use of force
  • Abstracts: How to use the Internet for estate planning and tax research. Post-mortem strategies extend planning prospects
  • Abstracts: It's unfair but practical. A lawyer's life is no bed of roses, but for many it beats the alternatives. Ethics: in many firms the practice of billable hours has become insidious
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.