Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

H's estate can't exclude property not taxed in W's estate

Article Abstract:

The Tax Court held, in Estate of Cavenaugh, that a husband's estate could not exclude property for which the husband made a qualified terminable interest property marital deduction election in the wife's estate. The wife's will stated that the husband had only a life-time interest, but the husband claimed the deduction, sold the property and benefited from the proceeds. The husband's estate tried to claim the election was nullified by the wife's will but the Court determined that the election should hold and included all of the previously excluded property under IRC section 2044.

Author: Madden, Robert E., Hayes, Lisa H.R., Schlenger, Jacques T.
Publisher: Warren, Gorham & Lamont, Inc.
Publication Name: Estate Planning
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0094-1794
Year: 1993
Decedents' estates

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Service could revalue gifts for estate tax purposes

Article Abstract:

The US Tax Court has ruled in 'Stalcup' that the IRS can revalue gifts made in previous years for payment of estate tax even after the statute of limitations for revaluing the gifts for gift tax purposes has expired. The court decided that Congress must not have wanted the statute of limitations to apply to estate tax calculations since the estate tax statutes do not refer to IRC Section 2504(c), the gift tax statute that created the statute of limitations.

Author: Madden, Robert E., Hayes, Lisa H.R., Schlenger, Jacques T.
Publisher: Warren, Gorham & Lamont, Inc.
Publication Name: Estate Planning
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0094-1794
Year: 1992
Gift tax, Limitation of actions (Taxation), Statute of limitations (Taxation)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Estate tax burden could not be shifted to entirety property

Article Abstract:

The Fourth Circuit held in Estate of Reno that a testator could not reduce the marital deduction by shifting the estate tax burden from probate assets to nonprobate tenancy by the entirety property. This was a reversal of the Tax Court decision. The Fourth Circuit's decision meant that all of Reno's entirety property would go to his spouse, thereby qualifying for the marital deduction.

Author: Madden, Robert E., Hayes, Lisa H.R., Schlenger, Jacques T.
Publisher: Warren, Gorham & Lamont, Inc.
Publication Name: Estate Planning
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0094-1794
Year: 1992
Interpretation and construction, Real property tax, Real property taxes, Probate law, Income shifting, Tenancy by the entirety

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, Marital deduction, Transfer taxes
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Installment obligations cancelled at death result in taxable gain, rules tax court. Court agrees with IRS in calculating 691(c) deduction
  • Abstracts: Income taxation of estates and trusts: new planning ideas. Distributions of property from estates and trusts: avoiding income tax traps
  • Abstracts: The use of force against terrorism and international law. In defense of world public order. The incident at Cavalese and strategic compensation
  • Abstracts: Inslaw's fading fortunes; company finds no support in new report for claims that Justice stole its software. Inslaw investigator appointed; allegations of stolen software, international conspiracy dog Justice
  • Abstracts: Estate may adopt wait-and-see approach and determine amount of QTIP on date of election. QTIP was disallowed because of executors' discretion whether to make the election
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.