Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Human Genome Project raises patenting issues; debate focuses on patentability of expressed sequence tags - certain partial DNA sequences

Article Abstract:

The Human Genome Project has raised the issues of whether expressed sequence tags (ESTs) of DNA are patentable and how broad those patent claims should be. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) does not believe this is in the public interest, since not all the functions and usefulness of ESTs are known. The NIH feels EST patents might discourage the work needed to develop therapies based on the corresponding genes. The Patent and Trademark Office requires specific evidence of utility to grant EST patents, and limitations could be written into the law.

Author: Pasahow, Lynn, Kumamoto, Andrew
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1997
Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences, Genetic Engineering, Licenses, Patents & Trademarks, Analysis, Human Genome Project

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


New PTO guidelines only say ESTs are protectable; courts must now decide reach of patents for expressed sequence tags

Article Abstract:

The PTO's opinion that expressed sequence tags (ESTs), or partial sequences of genes, are patentable is discussed. Utility and written description are the two patent law requirements sure to be most discussed. EST claims have yet to be tested by the courts.

Author: Howard, Elizabeth, Anthony, William
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 2001

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Initial interest confusion test: no different online; in Internet cases, courts have required showing of direct competition

Article Abstract:

The increase in trademark infringement claims involving both domain names and metatags is discussed. Courts have been reluctant to applly the "initial interest confusion" test in cases of dissimilar or competing products

Author: Bischoff, Jamie B., Gillespie, Anne C.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 2001
Usage, Online services, Internet services, Protection and preservation, Domain names, Trademarks

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Intellectual property, DNA sequencers
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Interference statistics for fiscal years 1992 to 1994. Patentability of methods of medical treatment: a comparative study
  • Abstracts: Skepticism protects against dangers of abusive trusts. No swing vote premium on minority interest in family business
  • Abstracts: Computer patent trial issues: use and avoidance of s. 112, paragraph 6, to make your case. Open letter to the Supreme Court concerning patent law
  • Abstracts: Businessman says he was plot's victim. D.C. court strikes EPA ozone rules; the 'American Trucking' decision may significantly curb U.S. agencies' abilities to make discretionary policy decisions
  • Abstracts: New OECD treaty fights corruption; signatory countries will make it a crime to bribe foreign officials, which may level the playing field for the United States
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.