Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Imposing liability on drug testing laboratories for "false positives": getting around privity

Article Abstract:

Drug testing laboratories should be found to owe a duty of care to employees that suffer economic and emotional harm from false positive results, and privity and the economic harm rules should not operate to bar such claims. Because their livelihoods are at stake, employees should be able to sue for unintentional misconduct in administering drug testing. The imposition of negligence liability on accountants for purely economic harms suggests that the presumption against finding pure economic losses recoverable need not apply.

Author: Manfield, Karen
Publisher: University of Chicago Law School
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 1997
Cases, Pure economic loss doctrine, Economic loss doctrine, Privity, Drug testing laboratories

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Sticks and stones can break my name: nondefamatory negligent injury to reputation

Article Abstract:

Claims for injury to reputation as a result of negligence should be allowed in cases which are not precluded by defamation doctrine. Intentional communication by the defendant is required for defamation, but not necessarily intent to defame. If communication did not occur, a negligence claim should be allowed. The plaintiff in a negligence claim must be able to establish both foreseeability and damages to reputation in the form of economic loss or emotional distress.

Author: Silbaugh, Kate
Publisher: University of Chicago Law School
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 1992
Analysis, Reputation (Law), Reputation

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The externality of victim care

Article Abstract:

The author discusses the effect of liability rules on tort law. He argues that traditional thought on the effects of these rules is mistaken. A traditional liability scheme will not have the desired effect because such a model fails to take into account important factors.

Author: Meese, Alan J.
Publisher: University of Chicago Law School
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 2001
United States, Economic aspects, Torts, Strict liability

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Negligence
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Rethinking HIV counseling and testing. Can access to care for people living with HIV be expanded? Community planning for HIV prevention: findings from the first year
  • Abstracts: Products liability law - freedom of speech - Ninth Circuit holds that California's products liability law does not cover false statements in a book
  • Abstracts: Stock acquisitions and liquidations by S corporations: availability of benefits afforded by sections 332 and 338
  • Abstracts: Liability assumptions in spinoff transactions. Federal Circuit rules that allocation of earnings and profits in intra-group spin-off does not support increased basis
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.